Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35160391›Full record

ArticlePolymers2022

Toxicity Study and Quantitative Evaluation of Polyethylene Microplastics in ICR Mice.

Sijoon Lee, Kyung-Ku Kang, Soo-Eun Sung, Joo-Hee Choi, Minkyoung Sung, Keum-Yong Seong, Sunjong Lee, Seung Yun Yang, Min-Soo Seo, KilSoo Kim

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Polymers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 86 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Sijoon LeePreclinical Research Center, Daegu-Gyeongbuk Medical Innovation Foundation, Daegu 41061, Korea.
Kyung-Ku KangPreclinical Research Center, Daegu-Gyeongbuk Medical Innovation Foundation, Daegu 41061, Korea.
Soo-Eun SungPreclinical Research Center, Daegu-Gyeongbuk Medical Innovation Foundation, Daegu 41061, Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-9971-2443
Joo-Hee ChoiPreclinical Research Center, Daegu-Gyeongbuk Medical Innovation Foundation, Daegu 41061, Korea.
Minkyoung SungPreclinical Research Center, Daegu-Gyeongbuk Medical Innovation Foundation, Daegu 41061, Korea.
Keum-Yong SeongDepartment of Biomaterials Science (BK21 Four Program), Life and Industry Convergence Institute, Pusan National University, Miryang 50463, Korea.
Sunjong LeeKorea Institute of Industrial Technology, Cheonan 31056, Korea.
Seung Yun YangDepartment of Biomaterials Science (BK21 Four Program), Life and Industry Convergence Institute, Pusan National University, Miryang 50463, Korea.
Min-Soo SeoPreclinical Research Center, Daegu-Gyeongbuk Medical Innovation Foundation, Daegu 41061, Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-7817-2222
KilSoo KimPreclinical Research Center, Daegu-Gyeongbuk Medical Innovation Foundation, Daegu 41061, Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-7370-2685
Daegu-Gyeongbuk Medical Innovation Foundation · KRGyeongsang National University · KRPusan National University · KRKyungpook National University · KR

Funding

Korea Environmental Industry and Technology Institute 2020003120002
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The production, use, and waste of plastics increased worldwide, which resulted in environmental pollution and a growing public health problem. In particular, microplastics have the potential to accumulate in humans and mammals through the food chain. However, the toxicity of microplastics is not well understood. In this study, we investigated the toxicity of 10-50 μm polyethylene microplastics following single- and 28-day repeated oral administration (three different doses of microplastics of 500, 1000, and 2000 mg/kg/day) in ICR mice. For the investigation, we administered the microplastics orally for single- and 28-day repeated. Then, the histological and clinical pathology evaluations of the rodents were performed to evaluation of the toxicity test, and Raman spectroscopy was used to directly confirm the presence of polyethylene microplastics. In the single oral dose toxicity experiments, there were no changes in body weight and necropsy of the microplastics-treated group compared with that of controls. However, a histopathological evaluation revealed that inflammation from foreign bodies was evident in the lung tissue from the 28-day repeated oral dose toxicity group. Moreover, polyethylene microplastics were detected in the lung, stomach, duodenum, ileum, and serum by Raman spectroscopy. Our results corroborated the findings of lung inflammation after repeated oral administration of polyethylene microplastics. This study provides evidence of microplastic-induced toxicity following repeated exposure to mice.

Indexed as

microplasticspolyethylenequantitative evaluationtoxicity evaluation

Identifiers

PMID35160391
PMCPMC8839995
OpenAlexW4205802826

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.