Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35160351›Full record

ReviewPolymers2022

Recent Advances in the Development of Fire-Resistant Biocomposites-A Review.

Elvara Windra Madyaratri, Muhammad Rasyidur Ridho, Manggar Arum Aristri, Muhammad Adly Rahandi Lubis, Apri Heri Iswanto, Deded Sarip Nawawi, Petar Antov, Lubos Kristak, Andrea Majlingová, Widya Fatriasari

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Polymers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Elvara Windra MadyaratriDepartment of Forest Products, Faculty of Forestry and Environment, IPB University, Bogor 16680, Indonesia.
Muhammad Rasyidur RidhoDepartment of Forest Products, Faculty of Forestry and Environment, IPB University, Bogor 16680, Indonesia.
Manggar Arum AristriDepartment of Forest Products, Faculty of Forestry and Environment, IPB University, Bogor 16680, Indonesia.
Muhammad Adly Rahandi LubisResearch Center for Biomaterials BRIN, Jl Raya Bogor KM 46, Cibinong 16911, Indonesia.ORCID 0000-0001-7860-3125
Apri Heri IswantoDepartment of Forest Product, Faculty of Forestry, Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan 20155, Indonesia.ORCID 0000-0002-4243-1429
Deded Sarip NawawiDepartment of Forest Products, Faculty of Forestry and Environment, IPB University, Bogor 16680, Indonesia.
Petar AntovFaculty of Forest Industry, University of Forestry, 1797 Sofia, Bulgaria.ORCID 0000-0002-3837-5380
Lubos KristakFaculty of Wood Sciences and Technology, Technical University in Zvolen, 96001 Zvolen, Slovakia.ORCID 0000-0002-2385-5760
Andrea MajlingováFaculty of Wood Sciences and Technology, Technical University in Zvolen, 96001 Zvolen, Slovakia.ORCID 0000-0002-7450-4004
Widya FatriasariResearch Center for Biomaterials BRIN, Jl Raya Bogor KM 46, Cibinong 16911, Indonesia.ORCID 0000-0002-5166-9498

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biocomposites reinforced with natural fibers represent an eco-friendly and inexpensive alternative to conventional petroleum-based materials and have been increasingly utilized in a wide variety of industrial applications due to their numerous advantages, such as their good mechanical properties, low production costs, renewability, and biodegradability. However, these engineered composite materials have inherent downsides, such as their increased flammability when subjected to heat flux or flame initiators, which can limit their range of applications. As a result, certain attempts are still being made to reduce the flammability of biocomposites. The combustion of biobased composites can potentially create life-threatening conditions in buildings, resulting in substantial human and material losses. Additives known as flame-retardants (FRs) have been commonly used to improve the fire protection of wood and biocomposite materials, textiles, and other fields for the purpose of widening their application areas. At present, this practice is very common in the construction sector due to stringent fire safety regulations on residential and public buildings. The aim of this study was to present and discuss recent advances in the development of fire-resistant biocomposites. The flammability of wood and natural fibers as material resources to produce biocomposites was researched to build a holistic picture. Furthermore, the potential of lignin as an eco-friendly and low-cost FR additive to produce high-performance biocomposites with improved technological and fire properties was also discussed in detail. The development of sustainable FR systems, based on renewable raw materials, represents a viable and promising approach to manufacturing biocomposites with improved fire resistance, lower environmental footprint, and enhanced health and safety performance.

Indexed as

advanced biocompositesbiopolymersfire retardancygreen flame retardantsnatural fibersproduct safety

Identifiers

PMID35160351
PMCPMC8840495

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.