Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35160342›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2022

A New System for Periprosthetic Fracture Stabilization-A Biomechanical Comparison.

Daniel Rau, Gabriele Rußow, Mark Heyland, Dag Wulsten, Clemens Kösters, Werner Schmölz, Sven Märdian

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Daniel RauCenter for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charité-University Medicine Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4576-5707
Gabriele RußowCenter for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charité-University Medicine Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany.
Mark HeylandBIH-Julius Wolff Institute for Biomechanics and Musculoskeletal Regeneration, Charité-University Medicine Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7474-3948
Dag WulstenBIH-Julius Wolff Institute for Biomechanics and Musculoskeletal Regeneration, Charité-University Medicine Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany.
Clemens KöstersDepartment of Orthopedic, Trauma and Hand Surgery, Maria-Josef-Hospital Greven, 48268 Greven, Germany.
Werner SchmölzDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-2962-2594
Sven MärdianCenter for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charité-University Medicine Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, an increase in periprosthetic femur fractures has become apparent due to the increased number of hip replacements. In the case of Vancouver type B1 fractures, locking plate systems offer safe procedures. This study compared the distal lateral femur plate (LOQTEQ

Indexed as

biomechanical studylocking attachment plateLOQTEQ®periprosthetic femur fractureVancouver B1 fracture

Identifiers

PMID35160342
PMCPMC8836720

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.