Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35160332›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2022

Antimicrobial Meshes for Hernia Repair: Current Progress and Perspectives.

Simona Mirel, Alexandra Pusta, Mihaela Moldovan, Septimiu Moldovan

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Novel antimicrobial coating for hernia meshes.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2024
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Characterization andHeliyon · 2023
    Article
  12. A preliminaryJournal of biomaterials applications · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Simona MirelDepartment of Medical Devices, Iuliu Hațieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 400349 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.ORCID 0000-0001-6318-3826
Alexandra PustaDepartment of Medical Devices, Iuliu Hațieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 400349 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.ORCID 0000-0001-7789-6798
Mihaela MoldovanPediatric Surgery Department, Emergency Clinical Children's Hospital, 400370 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Septimiu MoldovanSurgery Department, Prof. Dr. O. Fodor Regional Institute of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 400162 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Iuliu Hațieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy · ROInstitutul Regional de Gastroenterologie Prof. Dr. Octavian Fodor · RO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent advances in the development of biomaterials have given rise to new options for surgery. New-generation medical devices can control chemical breakdown and resorption, prevent post-operative adhesion, and stimulate tissue regeneration. For the fabrication of medical devices, numerous biomaterials can be employed, including non-degradable biomaterials (silicone, polypropylene, expanded polytetrafluoroethylene) or biodegradable polymers, including implants and three-dimensional scaffolds for tissue engineering, which require particular physicochemical and biological properties. Based on the combination of new generation technologies and cell-based therapies, the biocompatible and bioactive properties of some of these medical products can lead to progress in the repair of injured or harmed tissue and in tissue regeneration. An important aspect in the use of these prosthetic devices is the associated infection risk, due to the medical complications and socio-economic impact. This paper provides the latest achievements in the field of antimicrobial surgical meshes for hernia repair and discusses the perspectives in the development of these innovative biomaterials.

Indexed as

antibioticsantimicrobial metalsantimicrobial surgical meshesantisepticsbiomaterialsherniainfection

Identifiers

PMID35160332
PMCPMC8836564
OpenAlexW4210970803

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.