Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35160279›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2022

Current Controversies and Challenges on BRAF V600K-Mutant Cutaneous Melanoma.

Alessandro Nepote, Gianluca Avallone, Simone Ribero, Francesco Cavallo, Gabriele Roccuzzo, Luca Mastorino, Claudio Conforti, Luca Paruzzo, Stefano Poletto, Fabrizio Carnevale Schianca and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Braf-Mutant Melanomas: Biology and Therapy.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. The Carcinogenesis of the Human Scalp: An Immunometabolic-Centered View.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. PredictingJournal of skin cancer · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Alessandro NepoteDepartment of Oncology, University of Turin, 10124 Torino, Italy.
Gianluca AvalloneDermatology Clinic, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, 10124 Turin, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7253-2370
Simone RiberoDermatology Clinic, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, 10124 Turin, Italy.
Francesco CavalloDermatology Clinic, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, 10124 Turin, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9296-826X
Gabriele RoccuzzoDermatology Clinic, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, 10124 Turin, Italy.
Luca MastorinoDermatology Clinic, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, 10124 Turin, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7386-3219
Claudio ConfortiDermatology Clinic, Maggiore Hospital of Trieste, 34125 Trieste, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5126-8873
Luca ParuzzoDepartment of Oncology, University of Turin, 10124 Torino, Italy.
Stefano PolettoDepartment of Oncology, University of Turin, 10124 Torino, Italy.
Fabrizio Carnevale SchiancaDepartment of Oncology, University of Turin, 10124 Torino, Italy.
Pietro QuaglinoDermatology Clinic, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, 10124 Turin, Italy.
Massimo AgliettaDepartment of Oncology, University of Turin, 10124 Torino, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

About 50% of melanomas harbour a BRAF mutation. Of these 50%, 10% have a V600K mutation. Although it is the second most common driver mutation after V600E, no specific studies have been conducted to identify a clinical and therapeutic gold standard for this patient subgroup. We analysed articles, including registrative clinical trials, to identify common clinical and biological traits of the V600K melanoma population, including different adopted therapeutic strategies. Melanoma V600K seems to be more frequent in Caucasian, male and elderly populations with a history of chronic sun damage and exposure. Prognosis is poor and no specific prognostic factor has been identified. Recent findings have underlined how melanoma V600K seems to be less dependent on the ERK/MAPK pathway, with a higher expression of PI3KB and a strong inhibition of multiple antiapoptotic pathways. Both target therapy with BRAF inhibitors + MEK inhibitors and immunotherapy with anti-checkpoint blockades are effective in melanoma V600K, although no sufficient evidence can currently support a formal recommendation for first line treatment choice in IIIC unresectable/IV stage patients. Still, melanoma V600K represents an unmet medical need and a marker of poor prognosis for cutaneous melanoma.

Indexed as

BRAF mutationBRAF V600Kcutaneous melanomaimmunotherapytarget therapy

Identifiers

PMID35160279
PMCPMC8836712

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.