Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35160263›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2022

Could Total Neoadjuvant Therapy Followed by Surgical Resection Be the New Standard of Care in Pancreatic Cancer? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Ottavia De Simoni, Marco Scarpa, Caterina Soldà, Francesca Bergamo, Sara Lonardi, Alberto Fantin, Pierluigi Pilati, Mario Gruppo

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ottavia De SimoniUnit of Surgical Oncology of Digestive Tract, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, 35128 Padua, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8788-5590
Marco ScarpaDepartment of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University Hospital of Padua, 35128 Padova, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0217-6523
Caterina SoldàUnit of Medical Oncology 1, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, 35128 Padua, Italy.
Francesca BergamoUnit of Medical Oncology 1, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, 35128 Padua, Italy.
Sara LonardiUnit of Medical Oncology 3, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, 35128 Padua, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7593-8138
Alberto FantinDepartment of Gastroenterology, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, 35128 Padua, Italy.
Pierluigi PilatiUnit of Surgical Oncology of Digestive Tract, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, 35128 Padua, Italy.
Mario GruppoUnit of Surgical Oncology of Digestive Tract, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, 35128 Padua, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5525-5762
Istituto Oncologico Veneto · ITUniversity of Padua · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTotal neoadjuvant therapy (TNT), intended as induction chemotherapy (IC) followed by radio-chemotherapy (RCT), has been taking hold in the treatment of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). The aim of this review is to summarize the available evidence on the role of TNT followed by curative surgery.

methodsEligible studies were those reporting on patients with PDAC undergoing curative surgery after TNT. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS).

resultsA total of 1080 patients with PDAC who had undergone TNT were analyzed. The most common IC regimen was Gemcitabine (N 620, 57%). Toxicity during IC varied from 14% to 51%. Disease progression during IC varied from 3% to 25%. 607 (62%) patients underwent curative surgery after IC + CRT. In meta-analysis, the available data on lymph node metastases radicality and 2 years OS had better results in favor of TNT groups (OR 1.77, 95% CI 1.20-2.60,

conclusionsDespite the heterogeneity of the studies, different selection criteria, and non-negligible drop-out rate, TNT demonstrated a potential superiority to NAT without CRT in oncological and pathological outcomes, even if the main differences seem to depend on the IC regimen.

Indexed as

induction chemotherapyoverall survivalpancreatectomypancreatic cancerpancreatic surgeryradio-chemotherapytotal neoadjuvant therapy

Identifiers

PMID35160263
PMCPMC8836959
OpenAlexW4210259730

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.