Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35160207›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2022

Impact of COVID-19-Related Lockdown on Delivery and Perinatal Outcomes: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Thibaud Quibel, Norbert Winer, Laurence Bussières, Christophe Vayssière, Philippe Deruelle, Manon Defrance, Patrick Rozenberg, Jean Bouyer, Ninon Dupuis, Benoit Renaudin and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Does infection with COVID-2019 during labor increase the risk for obstetric anal sphincter injuries?International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Thibaud QuibelDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Poissy-Saint Germain Hospital, 78300 Poissy, France.
Norbert WinerObstetrics and Gynecology Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nantes, 44035 Nantes, France.
Laurence BussièresObstetrics, and Fetal Medicine and Surgery Department, Hôpital Necker-Enfants Maladies, AP-HP, 75007 Paris, France.
Christophe VayssièreDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Paule de Viguier Hospital, CHU Toulouse, 31059 Toulouse, France.
Philippe DeruelleDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital of Strasbourg, Avenue Moliere, 67000 Strasbourg, France.
Manon DefranceDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Poissy-Saint Germain Hospital, 78300 Poissy, France.
Patrick RozenbergDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Poissy-Saint Germain Hospital, 78300 Poissy, France.
Jean BouyerUVSQ, Inserm, Team U1018, Clinical Epidemiology, Centre de Recherche en Épidé-miologie et Santé des Populations (CESP), Paris Saclay University, 78180 Montigny-le-Bretonneux, France.
Ninon DupuisDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Paule de Viguier Hospital, CHU Toulouse, 31059 Toulouse, France.
Benoit RenaudinObstetrics, and Fetal Medicine and Surgery Department, Hôpital Necker-Enfants Maladies, AP-HP, 75007 Paris, France.
Louise DugaveCHU Lille, Department of Obstetrics, 59000 Lille, France.
Nathalie BanaszkiewiczObstetrics and Gynecology Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nantes, 44035 Nantes, France.
Charles GarabedianCHU Lille, Department of Obstetrics, 59000 Lille, France.ORCID 0000-0003-2105-9784
Yves VilleObstetrics, and Fetal Medicine and Surgery Department, Hôpital Necker-Enfants Maladies, AP-HP, 75007 Paris, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe magnitude and direction of effects on pregnancy outcomes of the lockdown imposed during COVID-19 have been uncertain and debated. Therefore, we aimed to quantify delivery and perinatal outcomes during the first nationwide lockdown due to the COVID-19 pandemic compared with the same durations of time for the pre- and post-lockdown periods. STUDY

designThis was a retrospective cohort study of six university hospital maternity units distributed across France, each of which serves as the obstetric care referral unit within its respective perinatal network. Maternal and perinatal outcomes were compared between the lockdown period and same-duration (i.e., 55-day) periods before and after the 2020 lockdown (pre-lockdown: 22 January-16 March; lockdown: 17 March-10 May; post-lockdown: 11 May-4 July). We compared the overall rates of Caesarean delivery (CD), pre-labor CD, labor induction, operative vaginal delivery, severe postpartum hemorrhage (≥1 L), severe perineal tear, maternal transfusion, and neonatal mortality and morbidity (1- and 5-min Apgar scores < 7), hypoxia and anoxia (umbilical arterial pH < 7.20 or <7.10, respectively), and admission to a neonatal intensive care unit before discharge. Adjusted odds ratios were estimated using logistic regression, controlling for region of birth, maternal age category, multiparity, multiple pregnancies, diabetes, and hypertensive disorders.

resultsThe study sample consisted of 11,929 women who delivered consecutively at one of the six maternity units studied (4093 pre-lockdown, 3829 during lockdown, and 4007 post-lockdown) and their 12,179 neonates (4169 pre-lockdown, 3905 during lockdown, and 4105 post-lockdown). The maternal and obstetric characteristics of the women delivering during the lockdown period were alike those delivering pre- and post-lockdown on maternal age, parity, body mass index, rate of complication by hypertensive disorders or insulin-treated diabetes, and gestational age at delivery. Overall CD rates were similar during the three periods (23.6%, 24.8%, and 24.3% pre-lockdown, lockdown, and post-lockdown, respectively) and no outcome differed significantly during lockdown compared to pre- and post-lockdown. These findings were consistent across maternity units.

conclusionThe maternal and perinatal outcomes are reassuring regarding the performance of the health-care system during the COVID-19 lockdown studied. Such information is crucial, because additional COVID-19-related lockdowns might still be needed. They are also instructive regarding potential future pandemics.

Indexed as

lockdownpandemic COVID-19perinatal and obstetrical issuespregnancy

Identifiers

PMID35160207
PMCPMC8837050

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.