Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35160164›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2022

"Heart in DRESS": Cardiac Manifestations, Treatment and Outcome of Patients with Drug Reaction with Eosinophilia and Systemic Symptoms Syndrome: A Systematic Review.

Milan Radovanovic, Djordje Jevtic, Andrew D Calvin, Marija Petrovic, Margaret Paulson, Libardo Rueda Prada, Lawrence Sprecher, Ivana Savic, Igor Dumic

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Hypersensitivity Reactions to Anticonvulsants.Current allergy and asthma reports · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Milan RadovanovicMayo Clinic Alix School of Medicine, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9692-8772
Djordje JevticSchool of Medicine, University of Belgrade, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia.ORCID 0000-0003-3790-3951
Andrew D CalvinMayo Clinic Alix School of Medicine, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
Marija PetrovicIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA.
Margaret PaulsonMayo Clinic Alix School of Medicine, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
Libardo Rueda PradaMayo Clinic Alix School of Medicine, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6964-5956
Lawrence SprecherMayo Clinic Alix School of Medicine, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
Ivana SavicSchool of Medicine, University of Belgrade, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia.
Igor DumicMayo Clinic Alix School of Medicine, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5312-8812
Mayo Clinic Health System · USUniversity of Belgrade · RSIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cardiac involvement in drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DS) is rare but associated with high mortality. The aim of this research was to systematically review case reports by PRISMA guidelines in order to synthetize the knowledge of cardiac manifestations of DS. We identified 42 cases from 36 case reports. Women were two times more affected than men. Two-thirds of patients had cardiac manifestation in the initial phase of the disease, while in one-third of cases cardiac manifestations developed later (mean time of 70 ± 63 days). The most common inciting medications were minocycline (19%) and allopurinol (12%). In 17% of patients, the heart was the only internal organ affected, while the majority (83%) had at least one additional organ involved, most commonly the liver and the kidneys. Dyspnea (55%), cardiogenic shock (43%), chest pain (38%), and tachycardia (33%) were the most common cardiac signs and symptoms reported. Patients frequently had an abnormal ECG (71.4%), and a decrease in left ventricular ejection fraction was the most common echocardiographic finding (45%). Endomyocardial biopsy or histological examination at autopsy was performed in 52.4%, with the predominant finding being fulminant eosinophilic myocarditis with acute necrosis in 70% of those biopsied. All patients received immunosuppressive therapy with intravenous steroids, while non-responders were more likely to have received IVIG, cyclosporine, mycophenolate, and other steroid-sparing agents (60%). Gender and degree of left ventricular systolic dysfunction were not associated with outcomes, but short latency between drug exposure and the first DRESS symptom onset (<15 days) and older age (above 65 years) was associated with death. This underscores the potential importance of heightened awareness and early treatment.

Indexed as

DRESS syndromedrug hypersensitivitydrug reactionheart failuremyocarditispericarditis

Identifiers

PMID35160164
PMCPMC8836915
OpenAlexW4210811883

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.