Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35160127›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2022

Emerging Technologies for Dentin Caries Detection-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Christa Serban, Diana Lungeanu, Sergiu-David Bota, Claudia C Cotca, Meda Lavinia Negrutiu, Virgil-Florin Duma, Cosmin Sinescu, Emanuela Lidia Craciunescu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Christa SerbanSchool of Dental Medicine, "Victor Babes" University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Timisoara, 300070 Timisoara, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-0026-9021
Diana LungeanuCenter for Modeling Biological Systems and Data Analysis, "Victor Babes" University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Timisoara, 300041 Timisoara, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-0274-1377
Sergiu-David BotaSchool of Dental Medicine, "Victor Babes" University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Timisoara, 300070 Timisoara, Romania.
Claudia C CotcaWashington Institute for Dentistry & Laser Surgery, Chevy Chase, MD 20815, USA.
Meda Lavinia NegrutiuSchool of Dental Medicine, "Victor Babes" University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Timisoara, 300070 Timisoara, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-1126-3944
Virgil-Florin DumaResearch Center in Dental Medicine Using Conventional and Alternative Technologies, "Victor Babes" University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Timisoara, 300070 Timisoara, Romania.ORCID 0000-0001-5558-4777
Cosmin SinescuSchool of Dental Medicine, "Victor Babes" University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Timisoara, 300070 Timisoara, Romania.
Emanuela Lidia CraciunescuSchool of Dental Medicine, "Victor Babes" University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Timisoara, 300070 Timisoara, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-0204-3026

Funding

Romanian Ministry of Research, Innovation and Digitization, CNCS/CCCDI-UEFISCDI project PN-III-P4-ID-PCE-2020-2600, within PNCDI III (http://3om-group-optomechatronics.ro/, accessed on 7 July 2021)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed at assessing the diagnostic accuracy of emerging technologies, such as laser fluorescence (LF), transillumination, light-emitting diode devices, optical coherence tomography (OCT), alternating current impedance spectroscopy, fluorescence cameras (FC), photo-thermal radiometry, and modulated luminescence technology. In vivo and in vitro results of such non-ionizing, non-invasive, and non-destructive methods' effectiveness in non-cavitated dentin caries detection are sometimes ambiguous. Following the PRISMA guidelines, 34 relevant research articles published between 2011-2021 were selected. The risk of bias was assessed with a tool tailored for caries diagnostic studies, and subsequent quantitative uni- and bi-variate meta-analysis was carried out in separate sub-groups according to the investigated surface (occlusal/proximal) and study setting (in vivo/in vitro). In spite of the high heterogeneity across the review groups, in vitro studies on LF and FC proved a good diagnostic ability for the occlusal surface, with area under the curve (AUC) of 0.803 (11 studies) and 0.845 (five studies), respectively. OCT studies reported an outstanding performance with an overall AUC = 0.945 (four studies). Promising technologies, such as OCT or FC VistaProof, still need well-designed and well-powered studies to accrue experimental and clinical data for conclusive medical evidence, especially for the proximal surface. Registration: INPLASY202210097.

Indexed as

dental cariesdiagnosislaser fluorescencenon-cavitated dentin cariesocclusal cariesoptical coherence tomography (OCT)permanent teethproximal cariessensitivityspecificity

Identifiers

PMID35160127
PMCPMC8837049

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.