Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35160123›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2022

Clinical Significance of Multiparameter Intracranial Pressure Monitoring in the Prognosis Prediction of Hypertensive Intracerebral Hemorrhage.

Yongbo Yang, Yuchun Pan, Chunlei Chen, Penglai Zhao, Chunhua Hang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yongbo YangDepartment of Neurosurgery, The Affiliated Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing 210008, China.
Yuchun PanDepartment of Neurosurgery, Nanjing Lishui People's Hospital, Nanjing 211200, China.ORCID 0000-0003-3789-6990
Chunlei ChenDepartment of Neurosurgery, The Affiliated Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing 210008, China.
Penglai ZhaoDepartment of Neurosurgery, The Affiliated Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing 210008, China.ORCID 0000-0003-0370-5228
Chunhua HangDepartment of Neurosurgery, The Affiliated Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing 210008, China.
Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital · CNLishui City People's Hospital · CN

Funding

Penglai Zhao Jiangsu University Clinical Medical Science and Technology Development Project (JLY20180213)Penglai Zhao Jiangsu University Clinical Medical Science and Technology Development Project (JLY20180216)Penglai Zhao Nanjing Medical Science and Technique Development Foundation (QRX 17084)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe present study aimed to investigate the clinical significance of multiparameter intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring in the prediction of the prognosis of hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage (HICH).

methodsA retrospective analysis was performed on the clinical data of 53 HICH patients. The patients underwent removal of intracranial hemorrhage and decompressive craniectomy after admission. A ventricular ICP monitoring probe was used to continuously and invasively monitor mean arterial pressure (MAP) and ICP after surgery. The NEUMATIC system was used to collect ICP data, including pressure reactivity index (PRx), ICP dose (DICP), amplitude and pressure regression (RAP), and cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP). The mean PRx, CPP, RAP, ICP, and DICP20 mmHg × h were calculated with 1 h as the time segment. According to the Glasgow outcome scale (GOS) scores after discharge, the patients were grouped into the poor prognosis group (GOS I-III) and the good prognosis group (GOS IV and V). The two groups were compared in terms of GOS scores in the treatment and prediction of prognosis of patients.

resultsThe good prognosis group showed significantly lower values of mean ICP, DICP20 mmHg × h, RAP, and PRx than the poor prognosis group, while CPP was significantly higher (

conclusionsPRx, DICP, RAP, and CPP could reflect intracranial changes in patients and were significantly correlated with the prognosis of the patients. Mean ICP, PRx, DICP20 mmHg × h, and RAP were negatively correlated with prognosis, while CPP was positively correlated with prognosis.

Indexed as

brain injuryhypertensive intracerebral hemorrhagemulti-parameter intracranial pressure monitoring

Identifiers

PMID35160123
PMCPMC8836722
OpenAlexW4212800578

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.