ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2022
Functional Status Following Pulmonary Rehabilitation: Responders and Non-Responders.
Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Personality in pulmonary rehabilitation: why dispositions matter more than cut-offs.ERJ open research · 2026Article
- Short- and Long-Term Responses to Pulmonary Rehabilitation in 922 Patients with COPD: A Real-World Database Study (2002-2019).Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Characteristics of responders to interventions for Parkinson disease: a scoping systematic review.Neurodegenerative disease management · 2025Article
- Cough in pulmonary rehabilitation: a retrospective analysis of responders and nonresponders.ERJ open research · 2025Article
- The intersection of HIF-1α, O-GlcNAc, and skeletal muscle loss in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.Glycobiology · 2023Review
- Pulmonary telerehabilitation vs. conventional pulmonary rehabilitation - a secondary responder analysis.Thorax · 2023Article
- Predictors of Success of Inpatient Pulmonary Rehabilitation Program in COPD Patients.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2023Article
- Efficacy of Acupuncture on Quality of Life, Functional Performance, Dyspnea, and Pulmonary Function in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Protocol for a Randomized Clinical Trial.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- Monthly Follow-Ups of Functional Status in People with COPD: A Longitudinal Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The 6 min walking test (6MWT) has been largely studied. Less is, however, known about responders and non-responders to pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) in other meaningful activities. We explored responders and non-responders and the predictors of response to PR in the 1 min sit-to-stand test (1 min STS) and the 6MWT and compared both measures in classifying responders. An observational study was conducted with 121 people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The functional status was assessed before and after PR. Baseline differences between responders and non-responders were tested with Mann-Whitney U, chi-square, or Fisher exact tests. Predictors were explored with binary logistic regressions. Agreement between both measures was assessed with chi-square, Cohen's kappa, and McNemar tests. There were 54.5% and 57.0% of responders in the 1 min STS and the 6MWT, respectively. The proportion of responders was significantly different (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.