Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35159900›Full record

ArticleNanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Numerical Simulation of Temperature Variations during the Application of Safety Protocols in Magnetic Particle Hyperthermia.

Gerasimos Pefanis, Nikolaos Maniotis, Aikaterini-Rafailia Tsiapla, Antonios Makridis, Theodoros Samaras, Mavroeidis Angelakeris

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Study on TiODisease markers · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Gerasimos PefanisFaculty of Sciences, School of Physics, Aristotle University, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece.
Nikolaos ManiotisFaculty of Sciences, School of Physics, Aristotle University, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece.ORCID 0000-0003-1825-9961
Aikaterini-Rafailia TsiaplaFaculty of Sciences, School of Physics, Aristotle University, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece.ORCID 0000-0001-8203-7664
Antonios MakridisFaculty of Sciences, School of Physics, Aristotle University, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-7609-1362
Theodoros SamarasFaculty of Sciences, School of Physics, Aristotle University, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece.ORCID 0000-0003-0170-4520
Mavroeidis AngelakerisFaculty of Sciences, School of Physics, Aristotle University, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece.ORCID 0000-0001-9109-0221

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Unavoidably, magnetic particle hyperthermia is limited by the unwanted heating of the neighboring healthy tissues, due to the generation of eddy currents. Eddy currents naturally occur, due to the applied alternating magnetic field, which is used to excite the nanoparticles in the tumor and, therefore, restrict treatment efficiency in clinical application. In this work, we present two simply applicable methods for reducing the heating of healthy tissues by simultaneously keeping the heating of cancer tissue, due to magnetic nanoparticles, at an adequate level. The first method involves moving the induction coil relative to the phantom tissue during the exposure. More specifically, the coil is moving symmetrically-left and right relative to the specimen-in a bidirectional fashion. In this case, the impact of the maximum distance (2-8 cm) between the coil and the phantom is investigated. In the second method, the magnetic field is applied intermittently (in an ON/OFF pulsed mode), instead of the continuous field mode usually employed. The parameters of the intermittent field mode, such as the time intervals (ON time and OFF time) and field amplitude, are optimized based on the numerical assessment of temperature increase in healthy tissue and cancer tissue phantoms. Different ON and OFF times were tested in the range of 25-100 s and 50-200 s, respectively, and under variable field amplitudes (45-70 mT). In all the protocols studied here, the main goal is to generate inside the cancer tissue phantom the maximum temperature increase, possible (preferably within the magnetic hyperthermia window of 4-8 °C), while restricting the temperature increase in the healthy tissue phantom to below 4 °C, signifying eddy current mitigation.

Indexed as

eddy currents reductionmagnetic nanoparticlesmagnetic particle hyperthermiatissue sparing

Identifiers

PMID35159900
PMCPMC8839068

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.