Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35159605›Full record

ReviewFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Exploring the Future of Edible Insects in Europe.

Simone Mancini, Giovanni Sogari, Salomon Espinosa Diaz, Davide Menozzi, Gisella Paci, Roberta Moruzzo

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
28.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 145 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Have the environmental benefits of insect farming been overstated? A critical review.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Black Soldier Fly (Veterinary sciences · 2025
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Protein hydrolysates fromTranslational animal science · 2025
    Article
  17. Exploring Sustainable Future Protein Sources.Food science of animal resources · 2025
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Simone ManciniDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, University of Pisa, Viale delle Piagge 2, 56124 Pisa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8643-507X
Giovanni SogariDepartment of Food and Drug, University of Parma, Parco Area delle Scienze 27/A, 43124 Parma, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2561-571X
Salomon Espinosa DiazDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, University of Pisa, Viale delle Piagge 2, 56124 Pisa, Italy.
Davide MenozziDepartment of Food and Drug, University of Parma, Parco Area delle Scienze 27/A, 43124 Parma, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5241-1587
Gisella PaciDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, University of Pisa, Viale delle Piagge 2, 56124 Pisa, Italy.
Roberta MoruzzoDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, University of Pisa, Viale delle Piagge 2, 56124 Pisa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2753-9183
University of Pisa · ITUniversity of Parma · IT

Funding

University of Pisa, grant PRA (Progetti di Ricerca di Ateneo) number PRA_2020_12
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The effects of population increase and food production on the environment have prompted various international organizations to focus on the future potential for more environmentally friendly and alternative protein products. One of those alternatives might be edible insects. Entomophagy, the practice of eating insects by humans, is common in some places but has traditionally been shunned in others, such as European countries. The last decade has seen a growing interest from the public and private sectors to the research in the sphere of edible insects, as well as significant steps forward from the legislative perspective. In the EU, edible insects are considered novel foods, therefore a specific request and procedure must be followed to place them in the market; in fact, until now, four requests regarding insects as a novel food have been approved. Insects could also be used as feed for livestock, helping to increase food production without burdening the environment (indirect entomophagy). Market perspectives for the middle of this decade indicate that most of the demand will be from the feed sector (as pet food or livestock feed production). Undoubtedly, this sector is gaining momentum and its potential relies not only in food, but also in feed in the context of a circular economy.

Indexed as

acceptancealternative proteincricketentomophagygrasshopperlocustmealwormneophobianovel foodsustainability

Identifiers

PMID35159605
PMCPMC8834392
OpenAlexW4210365262

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.