Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35159578›Full record

ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Should Panelists Refrain from Wearing a Personal Fragrance Prior to Sensory Evaluation? The Effect of Using Perfume on Olfactory Performance.

Thadeus L Beekman, Kaushik Luthra, Shady Afrin Jeesan, Rebecca Bowie, Han-Seok Seo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Thadeus L BeekmanDepartment of Food Science, University of Arkansas, 2650 North Young Avenue, Fayetteville, AR 72704, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6075-9233
Kaushik LuthraDepartment of Food Science, University of Arkansas, 2650 North Young Avenue, Fayetteville, AR 72704, USA.
Shady Afrin JeesanDepartment of Food Science, University of Arkansas, 2650 North Young Avenue, Fayetteville, AR 72704, USA.
Rebecca BowieDepartment of Food Science, University of Arkansas, 2650 North Young Avenue, Fayetteville, AR 72704, USA.
Han-Seok SeoDepartment of Food Science, University of Arkansas, 2650 North Young Avenue, Fayetteville, AR 72704, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9845-8199

Funding

United States Department of Agriculture National Institute of Food and Agriculture Hatch Act funding
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is typically recommended that panelists should refrain from wearing personal fragrances, such as perfume or cologne, prior to sensory evaluation. Interestingly, no study has been reported as to whether panelists' perceptions of test samples could be affected by personal fragrances worn by themselves. The objective of this study was, therefore, to determine the effect of such a personal fragrance on olfactory performance. Nineteen untrained participants were screened, recruited for, and underwent the Sniffin' Sticks test designed for measuring olfactory performances that included the odor threshold, discrimination, and identification (TDI). The olfactory performance tasks were conducted under three fragrance level conditions: (1) control (no fragrance), (2) just-about-right (JAR), and (3) excessive, with a preliminary study used to identify both the JAR and excessive fragrance levels. The results showed that the odor discrimination, odor threshold, and combined TDI performances were significantly lowered in the two conditions with the perfume fragrance, while the odor identification performance exhibited no significant differences across all three conditions. These findings provide empirical evidence that even low to moderate levels of personal fragrance can significantly reduce individuals' olfactory capabilities, possibly subsequently altering the perception of test samples during sensory evaluation.

Indexed as

discriminationfragranceidentificationolfactoryperfumesensorySniffin’ Sticksthreshold

Identifiers

PMID35159578
PMCPMC8834429

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.