Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35159469›Full record

ReviewFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2022

A Comprehensive Review on Bio-Preservation of Bread: An Approach to Adopt Wholesome Strategies.

Mizanur Rahman, Raihanul Islam, Shariful Hasan, Wahidu Zzaman, Md Rahmatuzzaman Rana, Shafi Ahmed, Mukta Roy, Asm Sayem, Abdul Matin, António Raposo and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 75 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Isolation and Characterization of aJournal of microbiology and biotechnology · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Effects of heterotrophicFood chemistry: X · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Mizanur RahmanDepartment of Food Engineering and Tea Technology, Shahjalal University of Science and Technology, Sylhet 3100, Bangladesh.
Raihanul IslamDepartment of Food Engineering and Tea Technology, Shahjalal University of Science and Technology, Sylhet 3100, Bangladesh.
Shariful HasanDepartment of Food Engineering and Tea Technology, Shahjalal University of Science and Technology, Sylhet 3100, Bangladesh.
Wahidu ZzamanDepartment of Food Engineering and Tea Technology, Shahjalal University of Science and Technology, Sylhet 3100, Bangladesh.ORCID 0000-0003-1513-7301
Md Rahmatuzzaman RanaDepartment of Food Engineering and Tea Technology, Shahjalal University of Science and Technology, Sylhet 3100, Bangladesh.
Shafi AhmedDepartment of Agro Product Processing Technology, Jashore University of Science and Technology, Jashore 7400, Bangladesh.ORCID 0000-0002-9217-8871
Mukta RoyDepartment of Food Engineering and Tea Technology, Shahjalal University of Science and Technology, Sylhet 3100, Bangladesh.
Asm SayemDepartment of Food Engineering and Tea Technology, Shahjalal University of Science and Technology, Sylhet 3100, Bangladesh.
Abdul MatinDepartment of Food Processing and Engineering, Chattogram Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Chittagong 4203, Bangladesh.ORCID 0000-0002-2334-4397
António RaposoCBIOS (Research Center for Biosciences and Health Technologies), Universidade Lusófona de Humanidades e Tecnologias, Campo Grande 376, 1749-024 Lisboa, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-5286-2249
Renata Puppin ZandonadiDepartment of Nutrition, Campus Darcy Ribeiro, University of Brasilia, Asa Norte, Distrito Federal, Brasília 70910-900, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-0370-3089
Raquel Braz Assunção BotelhoDepartment of Nutrition, Campus Darcy Ribeiro, University of Brasilia, Asa Norte, Distrito Federal, Brasília 70910-900, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-0369-287X
Atiqur Rahman SunnyDepartment of Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, Shahjalal University of Science and Technology, Sylhet 3100, Bangladesh.
Shahjalal University of Science and Technology · BDUniversidade de Brasília · BRChattogram Veterinary and Animal Sciences University · BDUniversidade Lusófona · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bread is a food that is commonly recognized as a very convenient type of food, but it is also easily prone to microbial attack. As a result of bread spoilage, a significant economic loss occurs to both consumers and producers. For years, the bakery industry has sought to identify treatments that make bread safe and with an extended shelf-life to address this economic and safety concern, including replacing harmful chemical preservatives. New frontiers, on the other hand, have recently been explored. Alternative methods of bread preservation, such as microbial fermentation, utilization of plant and animal derivatives, nanofibers, and other innovative technologies, have yielded promising results. This review summarizes numerous research findings regarding the bio-preservation of bread and suggests potential applications of these techniques. Among these techniques, microbial fermentation using lactic acid bacteria strains and yeast has drawn significant interest nowadays because of their outstanding antifungal activity and shelf-life extending capacity. For example, bread slices with

Indexed as

active packagingantifungal activitybakery productsbio-preservativesmicrobial fermentationmold spoilageshelf-life

Identifiers

PMID35159469
PMCPMC8834264
OpenAlexW4210261910

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.