Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35159391›Full record

ReviewCells2022

What Have We Learned in 30 Years of Investigations on

Antonio Palazzo, Ruggiero Caizzi, Roberta Moschetti, René Massimiliano Marsano

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cells, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Mobilome of theInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Antonio PalazzoDipartimento di Biologia, Università di Bari, 70125 Bari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0961-6832
Ruggiero CaizziDipartimento di Biologia, Università di Bari, 70125 Bari, Italy.
Roberta MoschettiDipartimento di Biologia, Università di Bari, 70125 Bari, Italy.
René Massimiliano MarsanoDipartimento di Biologia, Università di Bari, 70125 Bari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8450-1010
University of Bari Aldo Moro · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transposable elements (TEs) have been historically depicted as detrimental genetic entities that selfishly aim at perpetuating themselves, invading genomes, and destroying genes. Scientists often co-opt "special" TEs to develop new and powerful genetic tools, that will hopefully aid in changing the future of the human being. However, many TEs are gentle, rarely unleash themselves to harm the genome, and bashfully contribute to generating diversity and novelty in the genomes they have colonized, yet they offer the opportunity to develop new molecular tools. In this review we summarize 30 years of research focused on the

Indexed as

DNA Transposable ElementsDrosophilaAnimalsDNA Transposable ElementsBari transposonsblurry promoterDrosophilaheterochromatinhorizontal transferregulationtransposon tandem repeat

Identifiers

PMID35159391
PMCPMC8834629
OpenAlexW4210965127

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.