ReviewCells2022
How We Manage Myelofibrosis Candidates for Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation.
Review in Cells, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- Optimization of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for patients with myelofibrosis treated with ruxolitinib: eligibility, best practices, and improving transplant outcomes.Annals of hematology · 2025Review
- The Applications of Machine Learning in the Management of Patients Undergoing Stem Cell Transplantation: Are We Ready?Cancers · 2025Review
- Navigating 'grey areas' and challenges during evaluation of transplant eligibility in specific myelofibrosis populations: a perspective on behalf of the Chronic Malignancies Working Party of the EBMT.Bone marrow transplantation · 2025Review
- Treatment Strategies Used in Treating Myelofibrosis: State of the Art.Hematology reports · 2024Review
- Spatial-transcriptomic profiling: a new lens for understanding myelofibrosis pathophysiology.Cell communication and signaling : CCS · 2024Review
- Myeloproliferative Neoplasms: Contemporary Review and Molecular Landscape.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Advances in management of primary myelofibrosis and polycythaemia vera: Implications in clinical practice.EJHaem · 2023Review
- Activity of ex vivo graft and DLI Engineering within the last decade increases, a survey from the EBMT Cellular Therapy & Immunobiology Working Party.Bone marrow transplantation · 2023Article
- Management of Myelofibrosis during Treatment with Ruxolitinib: A Real-World Perspective in Case of Resistance and/or Intolerance.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Moving from indication to transplantation is a critical process in myelofibrosis. Most of guidelines specifically focus on either myelofibrosis disease or transplant procedure, and, currently, no distinct indication for the management of MF candidates to transplant is available. Nevertheless, this period of time is crucial for the transplant outcome because engraftment, non-relapse mortality, and relapse incidence are greatly dependent upon the pre-transplant management. Based on these premises, in this review, we will go through the path of identification of the MF patients suitable for a transplant, by using disease-specific prognostic scores, and the evaluation of eligibility for a transplant, based on performance, comorbidity, and other combined tools. Then, we will focus on the process of donor and conditioning regimens' choice. The pre-transplant management of splenomegaly and constitutional symptoms, cytopenias, iron overload and transplant timing will be comprehensively discussed. The principal aim of this review is, therefore, to give a practical guidance for managing MF patients who are potential candidates for allo-HCT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.