Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35159338›Full record

ReviewCells2022

The Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells in Articular Cartilage Regeneration and Disease Modelling: Are We Ready for Their Clinical Use?

Michał S Lach, Monika A Rosochowicz, Magdalena Richter, Inga Jagiełło, Wiktoria M Suchorska, Tomasz Trzeciak

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cells, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Michał S LachRadiobiology Laboratory, Greater Poland Cancer Centre, 61-866 Poznan, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-3615-3768
Monika A RosochowiczRadiobiology Laboratory, Greater Poland Cancer Centre, 61-866 Poznan, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-9289-3103
Magdalena RichterDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, 61-545 Poznan, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-1818-5288
Inga JagiełłoGreater Poland Cancer Centre, Department of Tumour Pathology, 61-866 Poznan, Poland.
Wiktoria M SuchorskaRadiobiology Laboratory, Greater Poland Cancer Centre, 61-866 Poznan, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-4742-2465
Tomasz TrzeciakDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, 61-545 Poznan, Poland.

Funding

National Science Center UMO-2019/33/B/NZ5/01989
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of induced pluripotent stem cells has brought unlimited possibilities to the field of regenerative medicine. This could be ideal for treating osteoarthritis and other skeletal diseases, because the current procedures tend to be short-term solutions. The usage of induced pluripotent stem cells in the cell-based regeneration of cartilage damages could replace or improve on the current techniques. The patient's specific non-invasive collection of tissue for reprogramming purposes could also create a platform for drug screening and disease modelling for an overview of distinct skeletal abnormalities. In this review, we seek to summarise the latest achievements in the chondrogenic differentiation of pluripotent stem cells for regenerative purposes and disease modelling.

Indexed as

Cartilage, ArticularInduced Pluripotent Stem CellsCell DifferentiationChondrogenesisHumansRegenerative Medicinechondrodysplasiasdisease modellingiPSCosteoarthritisregenerative medicinestem cells

Identifiers

PMID35159338
PMCPMC8834349

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.