Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35159069›Full record

ArticleCancers2022

Chiara Nicolazzo, Francesca Belardinilli, Annarita Vestri, Valentina Magri, Gianluigi De Renzi, Michela De Meo, Salvatore Caponnetto, Federica Di Nicolantonio, Enrico Cortesi, Giuseppe Giannini and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Using tumor habitat-derived radiomic analysis during pretreatmentCancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Chiara NicolazzoDepartment of Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Roma, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2551-8979
Francesca BelardinilliDepartment of Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Roma, Italy.
Annarita VestriDepartment of Public Health and Infectious Disease, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Roma, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6139-7174
Valentina MagriDepartment of Radiology, Oncology and Pathology, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Roma, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7312-2904
Gianluigi De RenziDepartment of Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Roma, Italy.
Michela De MeoDepartment of Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Roma, Italy.
Salvatore CaponnettoDepartment of Radiology, Oncology and Pathology, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Roma, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2906-449X
Federica Di NicolantonioDepartment of Oncology, University of Turin, 10124 Torino, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9618-2010
Enrico CortesiDepartment of Radiology, Oncology and Pathology, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Roma, Italy.
Giuseppe GianniniDepartment of Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Roma, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0299-4056
Paola GazzanigaDepartment of Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Roma, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2325-2273
Sapienza University of Rome · ITCandiolo Cancer Institute · IT

Funding

Sapienza University of Rome RM11916B31436754
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Liquid biopsies have shown that, in

Indexed as

bevacizumabcolorectal cancerliquid biopsyRAS conversion

Identifiers

PMID35159069
PMCPMC8833999
OpenAlexW4210596686

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.