Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35159063›Full record

ReviewCancers2022

Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Prior Fertility-Sparing Surgery in Women with FIGO 2018 Stage IB2 Cervical Cancer: A Systematic Review.

Alessandro Buda, Martina Borghese, Andrea Puppo, Stefania Perotto, Antonia Novelli, Chiara Borghi, Elena Olearo, Elisa Tripodi, Alessandra Surace, Enrica Bar and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Alessandro BudaDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Michele e Pietro Ferrero Hospital, 12060 Verduno, Italy.
Martina BorgheseClinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Santa Croce e Carle Hospital, 12100 Cuneo, Italy.
Andrea PuppoClinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Santa Croce e Carle Hospital, 12100 Cuneo, Italy.
Stefania PerottoDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Michele e Pietro Ferrero Hospital, 12060 Verduno, Italy.
Antonia NovelliClinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Santa Croce e Carle Hospital, 12100 Cuneo, Italy.
Chiara BorghiDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Michele e Pietro Ferrero Hospital, 12060 Verduno, Italy.
Elena OlearoClinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Santa Croce e Carle Hospital, 12100 Cuneo, Italy.
Elisa TripodiDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Michele e Pietro Ferrero Hospital, 12060 Verduno, Italy.
Alessandra SuraceDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Michele e Pietro Ferrero Hospital, 12060 Verduno, Italy.
Enrica BarDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Michele e Pietro Ferrero Hospital, 12060 Verduno, Italy.
Giovanni ScambiaDipartimento Della Salute Della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy.
Francesco FanfaniDipartimento Della Salute Della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy.
Ospedale San Pietro Fatebenefratelli · ITAzienda Sanitaria Ospedaliera S.Croce e Carle Cuneo · ITUniversità Cattolica del Sacro Cuore · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nowadays, the optimal management of patients with cervical cancers measuring 2-4 cm desiring to maintain fertility is still uncertain. In this systematic review, we assessed the reliability of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) prior to fertility-sparing (FS) surgery in International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) 2018 stage IB2 cervical cancer, in terms of pathologic response, oncological and obstetric outcomes. The review of the literature was performed following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Data, using MEDLINE and PubMed, were searched for from 1 January 2005 up to 1 December 2020. We identified 20 articles and 114 women with IB2 disease, possible candidates for NACT prior to FS surgery. However, uterine conservation was achieved only in 76.7% of them. Patients reached optimal pathological response to NACT in 60.9% of cases and a TIP (cisplatin, ifosfamide and paclitaxel) regime was related to the best response. Suboptimal response to NACT appeared to be an independent negative prognostic factor. Up to 9.2% of patients recurred with a median 7.4-months DFS, and 4.6% of patients died of disease. Fifty percent of women tried to conceive after treatment and NACT prior to conization appeared to be the most promising alternative to upfront radical trachelectomy in terms of obstetric outcomes. In conclusion, NACT prior to FS surgery is an option, but the literature about this issue is still weak and FS should be carefully discussed with patients.

Indexed as

cervical cancerfertility-sparing surgeryneoadjuvant chemotherapy

Identifiers

PMID35159063
PMCPMC8833789
OpenAlexW4210781835

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.