Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35158959›Full record

ReviewCancers2022

Neuro-Oncology Patients as Human Research Subjects: Ethical Considerations for Cognitive and Behavioral Testing for Research Purposes.

Jasleen Kaur, Andrew Egladyous, Claudia Valdivia, Andy G S Daniel, Saritha Krishna, Alexander A Aabedi, David Brang, Shawn L Hervey-Jumper

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 48% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jasleen KaurDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9445-6935
Andrew EgladyousDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA.
Claudia ValdiviaDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA.
Andy G S DanielDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3871-3685
Saritha KrishnaDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA.
Alexander A AabediDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA.
David BrangDepartment of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
Shawn L Hervey-JumperDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA.
University of California, San Francisco · USUniversity of Michigan · US

Funding

Intratumoral functional connectivity with implications on synaptogenesis and aphasia recovery in adult astrocytic WHO II-III gliomaK08NS110919 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI HERVEY-JUMPER, SHAWN L. · 2019 to 2023
$1.0M
NCI NIH HHS L30 CA199570NIH HHS K08NS110919NINDS NIH HHS K08 NS110919Robert Wood Johnson Foundation 74259
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Language, cognition, and behavioral testing have become a fundamental component of standard clinical care for brain cancer patients. Many existing publications have identified and addressed potential ethical issues that are present in the biomedical setting mostly centering around the enrollment of vulnerable populations for therapeutic clinical trials. Well-established guides and publications have served as useful tools for clinicians; however, little has been published for researchers who share the same stage but administer tests and collect valuable data solely for non-therapeutic investigational purposes derived from voluntary patient participation. Obtaining informed consent and administering language, cognition, and behavioral tasks for the sole purpose of research involving cancer patients that exhibit motor speech difficulties and cognitive impairments has its own hardships. Researchers may encounter patients who experience emotional responses during tasks that challenge their existing impairments. Patients may have difficulty differentiating between clinical testing and research testing due to similarity of task design and their physician's dual role as a principal investigator in the study. It is important for researchers to practice the proposed methods emphasized in this article to maintain the overall well-being of patients while simultaneously fulfilling the purpose of the study in a research setting.

Indexed as

anxietyaphasiabehaviorcognitionethicalgliomainvestigationallanguageneuro-oncologyspeech

Identifiers

PMID35158959
PMCPMC8833547
OpenAlexW4212873334

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.