Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35158932›Full record

ReviewCancers2022

Application of Machine Learning Methods to Improve the Performance of Ultrasound in Head and Neck Oncology: A Literature Review.

Celia R DeJohn, Sydney R Grant, Mukund Seshadri

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Research on ultrasound-based radiomics: a bibliometric analysis.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2024
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Frontiers and hotspots ofFrontiers in oncology · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Celia R DeJohnCenter for Oral Oncology, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY 14263, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4260-5847
Sydney R GrantCell Stress and Biophysical Oncology Program, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY 14263, USA.
Mukund SeshadriCenter for Oral Oncology, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY 14263, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8729-9532

Funding

Two-Spirit Films in Indigenous Cancer HealthP30CA016056 · NCI · ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE CORP · PI Dean G. Tang · 1985 to 2026
$116.6M
Radiogenomic Credentialing of Head and Neck Cancer ModelsR01CA243456 · NCI · ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE CORP · PI SESHADRI, MUKUND · 2021 to 2025
$2.9M
Non-invasive assessment of salivary gland function: Translational StudiesR01CA204636 · NCI · ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE CORP · PI SESHADRI, MUKUND · 2016 to 2019
$1.6M
Developing Imaging Biomarkers of Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma Response to ImmunotherapyF31DE031184 · NIDCR · ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE CORP · PI DEJOHN, CELIA · 2021 to 2022
$64k
NCI NIH HHS P30CA016056NCI NIH HHS R01 CA204636NCI NIH HHS R01CA204636,NCI NIH HHS R01 CA243456NCI NIH HHS R01CA243456NIDCR NIH HHS F31 DE031184NIDCR NIH HHS F31DE031184
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Radiomics is a rapidly growing area of research within radiology that involves the extraction and modeling of high-dimensional quantitative imaging features using machine learning/artificial intelligence (ML/AI) methods. In this review, we describe the published clinical evidence on the application of ML methods to improve the performance of ultrasound (US) in head and neck oncology. A systematic search of electronic databases (MEDLINE, PubMed, clinicaltrials.gov) was conducted according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Of 15,080 initial articles identified, 34 studies were selected for in-depth analysis. Twenty-five out of 34 studies (74%) focused on the diagnostic application of US radiomics while 6 (18%) studies focused on response assessment and 3 (8%) studies utilized US radiomics for modeling normal tissue toxicity. Support vector machine (SVM) was the most commonly employed ML method (47%) followed by multivariate logistic regression (24%) and k-nearest neighbor analysis (21%). Only 11/34 (~32%) of the studies included an independent validation set. A majority of studies were retrospective in nature (76%) and based on single-center evaluation (85%) with variable numbers of patients (12-1609) and imaging datasets (32-1624). Despite these limitations, the application of ML methods resulted in improved diagnostic and prognostic performance of US highlighting the potential clinical utility of this approach.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencehead and neck cancermachine learningradiomicsultrasound

Identifiers

PMID35158932
PMCPMC8833587

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.