Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35158930›Full record

ReviewCancers2022

Long-Term Outcomes of Surgical Resection of Pathologically Confirmed Isolated Para-Aortic Lymph Node Metastases in Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review.

Maurizio Zizzo, Maria Pia Federica Dorma, Magda Zanelli, Francesca Sanguedolce, Maria Chiara Bassi, Andrea Palicelli, Stefano Ascani, Alessandro Giunta

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Maurizio ZizzoSurgical Oncology Unit, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9841-7856
Maria Pia Federica DormaSurgical Oncology Unit, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy.
Magda ZanelliPathology Unit, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8733-9933
Francesca SanguedolcePathology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria, Ospedali Riuniti di Foggia, 71122 Foggia, Italy.
Maria Chiara BassiMedical Library, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy.
Andrea PalicelliPathology Unit, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2299-5160
Stefano AscaniHematology Unit, CREO, Azienda Ospedaliera di Perugia, University of Perugia, 06129 Perugia, Italy.
Alessandro GiuntaSurgical Oncology Unit, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPara-aortic lymph node (PALN) metastases represent patterns of initial recurrence in only 2-6% CRC patients, after an estimated 23-28 month time interval. An increasing trend towards curative surgery has been witnessed in patients presenting with controlled PALN recurrence. Nevertheless, lack of consensus has impaired an unambiguous statement for PALN recurrence resection.

methodsWe performed a systematic literature review following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyzes (PRISMA) guidelines, which led us to gain deeper insight into the prognostic factors and long-term outcomes after resection for synchronous or metachronous pathologically confirmed CRC isolated para-aortic lymph node metastases (PALNM). Pubmed/MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane Library and Web of Science databases were used to search all related literature.

resultsThe nine articles included covered a study period of 30 years (1988-2018), with a total of 161 patients. At presentation, most primary CRCs were located in the colon (74%) and 95.6%, 87.1% and 76.9% patients had T3-T4, N1-N2 and well/moderately differentiated CRC, respectively. We identified a 59.4-68% 3-year OS rate and 53.4-87.5% 5-year OS rate, with a 25-84 months median OS, 26.3-61% 3-year DFS rate and 0-60.5% 5-year DFS rate, with a 14-24 month median DFS. Overall, 62.1% re-recurrence rate ranged from 43.8% to 100%.

conclusionsAlthough PALNMs resection in CRC patients may be considered a feasible and beneficial option, no conclusions or recommendations can be made taking into account the current evidence. Therefore, further randomized, possibly multicenter trials are strongly recommended and mandatory if we want to have our results confirmed and patient selection criteria clearly identified.

Indexed as

colorectal cancerlymph nodesmetastasesoutcomepara-aorticsurgery

Identifiers

PMID35158930
PMCPMC8833834

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.