ArticleCancers2022
Clinical Value of Surveillance
Article in Cancers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- PET/CT reading for relapse in non-small cell lung cancer after chemoradiotherapy in the PET-Plan trial cohort.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2023Trial
- Diagnostic Performance of Post-Treatment F-18 FDG PET/CT for Detecting Recurrent Cervical Cancer.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Reliability of [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025Article
- Characteristics of Oligo-Recurrence and Treatment Selection in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.Cancers · 2025Review
- Differentiating second primary lung cancer from pulmonary metastasis in patients of single solitary pulmonary lesion with extrapulmonary tumor using multiparametric analysis of FDG PET/CT.Annals of nuclear medicine · 2025Article
- Use of [Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Diagnosis and management of multiple primary lung cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Review
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
We evaluated the diagnostic value of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.