ReviewCancers2022
PARP Inhibitors: A Major Therapeutic Option in Endocrine-Receptor Positive Breast Cancers.
Review in Cancers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Continuous versus Standard Palbociclib Treatment and Molecular Profiling of Solid Tissues and Liquid Biopsies in the CCTG MA.38 Trial in Advanced Breast Cancer.Cancer research communications · 2025Trial
- Clinical effectiveness and safety of olaparib in BRCA-mutated, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer in a real-world setting: final analysis of LUCY.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2024Trial
- Evaluation of Olaparib Efficacy Following CDK4/6 Inhibitor Therapy in BRCA-Mutated, Hormone Receptor-Positive, HER2-Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Turkish Oncology Group (TOG) Study.Targeted oncology · 2026Article
- Article
- Progress and prospects in research and clinical practice of hormone receptor-positive, HER-2-negative breast cancer with BRCA1/2 mutations.Discover oncology · 2023Review
- PALB2 germline mutations in a large cohort of Middle Eastern breast-ovarian cancer patients.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Predominance ofCancers · 2022Article
- DNA Methylation Malleability and Dysregulation in Cancer Progression: Understanding the Role of PARP1.Biomolecules · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recently, OlympiAD and EMBRACA trials demonstrated the favorable efficacy/toxicity ratio of PARPi, compared to chemotherapy, in patients with HER2-negative metastatic breast cancers (mBC) carrying a germline BRCA mutation. PARPi have been largely adopted in triple-negative metastatic breast cancer, but their place has been less clearly defined in endocrine-receptor positive, HER2 negative (ER+/ HER2-) mBC. The present narrative review aims at addressing this question by identifying the patients that are more likely benefit from PARPi. Frequencies of BRCA pathogenic variant (PV) carriers among ER+/HER2- breast cancer patients have been underestimated, and many experts assume than 50% of all BRCA1/2 mutated breast cancers are of ER+/HER2- subtype. Patients with ER+/HER2- BRCA-mutated mBC seemed to have a higher risk of early disease progression while on CDK4/6 inhibitors and PARPi are effective especially when prescribed before exposure to chemotherapy. The OLYMPIA trial also highlighted the utility of PARPi in patients with early breast cancers at high risk of relapse and carrying PV of BRCA. PARPi might also be effective in patients with HRD diseases, representing up to 20% of ER+/HER2- breast cancers. Consequently, the future implementation of early genotyping strategies for identifying the patients with high-risk ER+/HER2- HRD breast cancers likely to benefit from PARPi is of high importance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.