Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35158822›Full record

ReviewCancers2022

Immunotherapy for Esophageal Cancer: State-of-the Art in 2021.

Hugo Teixeira Farinha, Antonia Digklia, Dimitrios Schizas, Nicolas Demartines, Markus Schäfer, Styliani Mantziari

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04389177 (Efficacy and Safety of Pembrolizumab Plus Paclitaxel, Cisplatin Followed by Surgery in Patients With Locally Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma), which is not on this map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04389177 phase2unknown statusnot on this map

Efficacy and Safety of Pembrolizumab Plus Paclitaxel, Cisplatin Followed by Surgery in Patients With Locally Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma (KEYSTONE-001)

TypeinterventionalSponsorTianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and HospitalRan2020 to 2024Enrolled50ConditionsEsophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma, Stage IIIArmsPembrolizumab Injection [Keytruda]
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Hugo Teixeira FarinhaDepartment of Visceral Surgery, Faculty of Biology and Medicine UNIL, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-9786-5208
Antonia DigkliaDepartment of Oncology, Faculty of Biology and Medicine UNIL, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland.
Dimitrios SchizasFirst Department of Surgery, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Laikon General Hospital, 157 72 Athens, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-7046-0112
Nicolas DemartinesDepartment of Visceral Surgery, Faculty of Biology and Medicine UNIL, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-1530-3114
Markus SchäferDepartment of Visceral Surgery, Faculty of Biology and Medicine UNIL, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-4335-4098
Styliani MantziariDepartment of Visceral Surgery, Faculty of Biology and Medicine UNIL, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-1315-1898
University of Lausanne · CHNational and Kapodistrian University of Athens · GR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The management of esophageal cancer (EC) has experienced manifold changes during the last decades. Centralization of EC treatment has been introduced in many countries, subsequently allowing the development of specialized high-volume centers. Minimal invasive surgery has replaced open surgery in many centers, whereas more potent systemic treatments have been introduced in clinical practice. Newer chemotherapy regimens increase long-term survival. Nevertheless, the overall survival of EC patients remains dismal for advanced tumor stages. In this direction, a wide range of targeted biologic agents (immunotherapy) is currently under assessment. Anti- Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-2 (HER-2) monoclonal antibodies are used in HER2 (+) tumors, predominantly well-differentiated adenocarcinomas, and are currently assessed in the neoadjuvant setting (TRAP, INNOVATION trials). Immune checkpoint inhibitors Nivolumab (ATTRACTION-03) and pembrolizumab (KEYNOTE-181), have demonstrated a survival benefit compared with conventional chemotherapy in heavily pre-treated progressive disease. More recently, CheckMate-577 showed very promising results for nivolumab in a curative adjuvant setting, improving disease-free survival mainly for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Several ongoing trials are investigating novel targeted agents in the preoperative setting of locally advanced EC. In addition, other immunomodulatory approaches such as peptide vaccines and tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) are currently under development and should be increasingly integrated into clinical practice.

Indexed as

esophageal adenocarcinomaimmunotherapyoesophageal cancersquamous cell cancertumor microenvironment

Identifiers

PMID35158822
PMCPMC8833794
OpenAlexW4213049833

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.