Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35158675›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2022

Practical Method for Freezing Buck Semen.

Jane M Morrell, Pongpreecha Malaluang, Theodoros Ntallaris, Anders Johannisson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jane M MorrellClinical Sciences, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU), P.O. Box 7054, SE-75007 Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-5245-7331
Pongpreecha MalaluangClinical Sciences, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU), P.O. Box 7054, SE-75007 Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-5508-4921
Theodoros NtallarisClinical Sciences, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU), P.O. Box 7054, SE-75007 Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-3588-091X
Anders JohannissonClinical Sciences, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU), P.O. Box 7054, SE-75007 Uppsala, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although several protocols for cryopreserving buck semen are described in the literature, they differ widely in factors such as season and method of semen collection, extender and sperm concentration. Therefore, choosing a protocol that is suitable for a particular on-farm situation can be problematic. In the present study, semen was collected by artificial vagina from seven bucks on a farm located approximately 90 minutes' drive away from the laboratory, about 6 weeks before the start of the goat breeding season. The semen was immediately extended in warm semen extender containing soy lecithin and was placed in an insulated box with a cold pack for up to 4 h, during semen collection from the remaining bucks and subsequent transport to the laboratory. Following centrifugation at 4 °C and resuspension in the soy lecithin extender to a sperm concentration of 800 × 10

Indexed as

chromatin integritygoat sperm cryopreservationplasma membrane integrityremoval of seminal plasmasoy lecithin semen extender

Identifiers

PMID35158675
PMCPMC8833527

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.