Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35158640›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2022

Effect of

Jing Hu, In-Ho Kim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Phenotypic and Genomic Analysis of Swine-DerivedAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article
  3. Role of C17 fengycin B fromApplied and environmental microbiology · 2026
    Article
  4. Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. DietaryAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Effect ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Winning the battle of intestinal peace withFrontiers in microbiology · 2025
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Characterization of the Effects of a Novel Probiotic onAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Frontiers in veterinary science · 2024
    Review
  19. Effect of the ProbioticVeterinary sciences · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jing HuCollege of Life Science, Linyi University, Shuang Ling Road Middle Section, Linyi 276400, China.
In-Ho KimDepartment of Animal Resource & Science, Dankook University, Cheonan 330-714, Choongnam, Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-6652-2504

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It has been well-documented that the dietary supplementation of

Indexed as

Bacillus subtilisgrowth performancemicrobiotanutrient digestibilityweanling piglets

Identifiers

PMID35158640
PMCPMC8833803

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.