Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35158633›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2022

Assessing Two Different Aerial Toxin Treatments for the Management of Invasive Rats.

Tess D R O'Malley, Margaret C Stanley, James C Russell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Pushing the limits: ship rat (Biological invasions · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Tess D R O'MalleySchool of Biological Sciences, University of Auckland, Waipapa Taumata Rau, Private Bag 92019, Auckland 1142, New Zealand.
Margaret C StanleySchool of Biological Sciences, University of Auckland, Waipapa Taumata Rau, Private Bag 92019, Auckland 1142, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0003-0701-8935
James C RussellSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Auckland, Waipapa Taumata Rau, Private Bag 92019, Auckland 1142, New Zealand.

Funding

Predator Free 2050 Ltd. 3720867Royal Society of New Zealand RDF-UOA1404
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aotearoa-New Zealand has embarked on an ambitious goal: to completely eradicate key invasive mammals by 2050. This will require novel tools capable of eliminating pests on a large scale. In New Zealand, large-scale pest suppression is typically carried out using aerial application of the toxin sodium fluoroacetate (1080). However, as currently applied, this tool does not remove all individuals. A novel application method, dubbed '1080-to-zero', aims to change this and reduce the abundances of target pests to zero or near-zero. One such target is black rats (

Indexed as

densityeradicationinvasive speciespredator-freeRattus rattusrodentsodium fluoroacetate (1080)spatially explicit capture–recapture

Identifiers

PMID35158633
PMCPMC8833531

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.