Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35158573›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2022

Analyses of Genetic Diversity in the Endangered "Berrenda" Spanish Cattle Breeds Using Pedigree Data.

Rafael González-Cano, Ana González-Martínez, María Eva Muñoz-Mejías, Pablo Valera, Evangelina Rodero

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Genetic Diversity and Population Structure of Sardo Negro Cattle.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Pedigree-Based Genetic Diversity in the South African Boerboel Dog Breed.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Competitiveness of Spanish Local Breeds.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Rafael González-CanoCERSYRA-IRIAF, Avenida del Vino 10, 048619 Valdepeñas Ciudad Real, Spain.
Ana González-MartínezDepartment of Animal Production, Faculty of Veterinary Sciences, University of Cordoba, 14071 Córdoba, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-4823-5357
María Eva Muñoz-MejíasDepartment of Animal Pathology, Animal Production, Bromathology and Food Technology, University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, 35001 Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain.
Pablo ValeraGescan, Gestión de Programas de Cría, 35017 Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain.
Evangelina RoderoDepartment of Animal Production, Faculty of Veterinary Sciences, University of Cordoba, 14071 Córdoba, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-4315-4291

Funding

UCO-ANABE OTRI nº 1220166
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pedigree analyses of two endangered cattle breeds were performed in order to study the structure and the genetic variability in their populations. Pedigree data were analyzed from 12,057 individuals belonging to the "Berrenda en Negro" cattle breed (BN) and 20,389 individuals belonging to the "Berrenda en Colorado" cattle breed (BC) that were born between 1983 and 2020. BN and BC reference populations (RP) were set up by 2300 and 3988 animals, respectively. The generation interval in BN and BC reference populations was equal to 6.50 and 6.92 years, respectively. The pedigree completeness level was 82.76% in BN and 79.57% in BC. The inbreeding rates were 4.5% in BN and 3.4% in BC, respectively. The relationship among animals when they were born in different herds was 1.8% in BN and 5% in BC; these values increased to 8.5% and 7.7%, respectively when comparing animals that were born in the same herd. The effective number of founding herds was 23.9 in BN and 60.9 in BC. Number of ancestors needed to explain 50% of genes pool in the whole population was 50 and 101, in BN and in BC, respectively. The effective population size based on co-ancestries was 92.28 in BN and 169.92 in BC. The genetic variability has been maintained in both populations over time and the results of this study suggest that measures to promote the conservation of the genetic variability in these two breeds would go through for the exchange of breeding animals among farms and for monitoring the genetic contributions before implementing any selective action.

Indexed as

conservationgenealogical datagenetic contributioninbreedingnative resources

Identifiers

PMID35158573
PMCPMC8833649

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.