ArticleHematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program2021
MRD in adult Ph/BCR-ABL-negative ALL: how best to eradicate?
Article in Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Anti-thymocyte globulin-resistant CD4Blood science (Baltimore, Md.) · 2026Article
- Measurable residual disease quantification in adult patients with KMT2A-rearranged acute lymphoblastic leukemia.Leukemia · 2024Article
- Liver failure after treatment with inotuzumab and polychemotherapy including PEG-asparaginase in a patient with relapsed Philadelphia chromosome-negative acute lymphoblastic leukemia.Annals of hematology · 2024Article
- TheFrontiers in oncology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Evaluation of minimal residual disease (MRD) during first-line treatment and after salvage therapy is part of the standard management of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Persistent or recurrent MRD is one of the most relevant prognostic factors and identifies a group of patients with resistance to standard chemotherapy. These patients have a high risk of relapse despite continued first-line therapy. Although stem cell transplantation (SCT) is an appropriate strategy, patients with high MRD show an increased relapse rate even after SCT. Approximately one-quarter of adult ALL patients develop an MRD failure, defined as MRD above 0.01% after standard induction and consolidation. The best time point and level of MRD for treatment modification are matters of debate. In order to eradicate MRD and thereby improve chances for a cure, new targeted compounds with different mechanisms of action compared to chemotherapy are being utilized. These compounds include monoclonal antibodies, chimeric antigen receptor T cells, and molecular targeted compounds. Essential factors for decision-making, available compounds, and follow-up therapies are discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.