ArticleJournal of educational evaluation for health professions2022
Obstetrics and gynecology residents' satisfaction and self-confidence after anal sphincter injury simulation-based workshop in Indonesia: a pre- and post-intervention comparison study.
Article in Journal of educational evaluation for health professions, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Randomized Comparison of Video Demonstration, Simulation-Based Training, and Combination Using Silicone-Latex Simulation for Anal Sphincter Injury Repair in Obstetrics and Gynecology Residents.International urogynecology journal · 2025Trial
- Objective structured assessment of medical students' technical skills in second-degree perineal laceration repair with sponge model-based training.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeObstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI) is one of the most common complication during delivery. Simulation models using manikin can be used as an effective medical learning method to improve students' abilities before meeting patients. It aimed to describe the development of anal sphincter injury model and assess the resident satisfaction and self-confidence after perineal repair workshop with anal sphincter injury simulator in Indonesia.
methodsThis was cross-sectional study with evaluation of outcome before and after workshop. We created silicone-latex simulation anal sphincter injury model. Then, we validated this simulation and made it as simulation model for workshop. We asked residents' satisfaction repairing anal sphincter injury using simulation model and residents' self-confidence when practicing the anal sphincter injury repair.
resultsAll residents felt the simulation-based workshop was valuable (100%). Most of score for similarity simulation model were good (about 8). The self-assessment of confidence was measured prior to the workshop and after the workshop. The overall self-confidence was increased significantly after workshop in procedure identification external sphincter ani (EAS) (P=0.031), suturing anal mucosa (P=0.001), suturing internal sphincter ani (P=0.001), suturing external sphincter ani (EAS) (P <0.001), evaluation of sphincter ani tone (P=0.016).
conclusionAnal sphincter injury simulator improves the self-confidence of residents in procedure identification external sphincter ani (EAS), suturing anal mucosa, suturing internal sphincter ani, suturing external sphincter ani (EAS) and evaluation of sphincter ani tone.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.