Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35157731›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

An integrated data framework for policy guidance during the coronavirus pandemic: Towards real-time decision support for economic policymakers.

Julian Oliver Dörr, Jan Kinne, David Lenz, Georg Licht, Peter Winker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Julian Oliver DörrDepartment of Economics of Innovation and Industrial Dynamics, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research, Mannheim, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6465-181X
Jan KinneDepartment of Economics of Innovation and Industrial Dynamics, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research, Mannheim, Germany.
David LenzDepartment of Econometrics and Statistics, Justus Liebig University Giessen, Gießen, Germany.
Georg LichtDepartment of Economics of Innovation and Industrial Dynamics, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research, Mannheim, Germany.
Peter WinkerDepartment of Econometrics and Statistics, Justus Liebig University Giessen, Gießen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Usually, official and survey-based statistics guide policymakers in their choice of response instruments to economic crises. However, in an early phase, after a sudden and unforeseen shock has caused unexpected and fast-changing dynamics, data from traditional statistics are only available with non-negligible time delays. This leaves policymakers uncertain about how to most effectively manage their economic countermeasures to support businesses, especially when they need to respond quickly, as in the COVID-19 pandemic. Given this information deficit, we propose a framework that guided policymakers throughout all stages of this unforeseen economic shock by providing timely and reliable sources of firm-level data as a basis to make informed policy decisions. We do so by combining early stage 'ad hoc' web analyses, 'follow-up' business surveys, and 'retrospective' analyses of firm outcomes. A particular focus of our framework is on assessing the early effects of the pandemic, using highly dynamic and large-scale data from corporate websites. Most notably, we show that textual references to the coronavirus pandemic published on a large sample of company websites and state-of-the-art text analysis methods allowed to capture the heterogeneity of the pandemic's effects at a very early stage and entailed a leading indication on later movements in firm credit ratings. While the proposed framework is specific to the COVID-19 pandemic, the integration of results obtained from real-time online sources in the design of subsequent surveys and their value in forecasting firm-level outcomes typically targeted by policy measures, is a first step towards a more timely and holistic approach for policy guidance in times of economic shocks.

Indexed as

Decision Support Systems, ClinicalEconomicsBankruptcyCommunicationCOVID-19HumansInternetRegression AnalysisRisk AssessmentSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID35157731
PMCPMC8843231

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.