Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35157716›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Identifying SARS-COV-2 infected patients through canine olfactive detection on axillary sweat samples; study of observed sensitivities and specificities within a group of trained dogs.

Dominique Grandjean, Capucine Gallet, Clothilde Julien, Riad Sarkis, Quentin Muzzin, Vinciane Roger, Didier Roisse, Nicolas Dirn, Clement Levert, Erwan Breton and 21 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

31 authors.

Dominique GrandjeanEcole Nationale Vétérinaire d'Alfort (Alfort School of Veterinary Medicine), University Paris-Est, Maisons-Alfort, France.ORCID 0000-0002-8408-8358
Capucine GalletEcole Nationale Vétérinaire d'Alfort (Alfort School of Veterinary Medicine), University Paris-Est, Maisons-Alfort, France.
Clothilde JulienEcole Nationale Vétérinaire d'Alfort (Alfort School of Veterinary Medicine), University Paris-Est, Maisons-Alfort, France.
Riad SarkisUniversité Franco-Libanaise St Joseph (Saint Joseph University of Beirut), Beirut, Lebanon.
Quentin MuzzinEcole Nationale Vétérinaire d'Alfort (Alfort School of Veterinary Medicine), University Paris-Est, Maisons-Alfort, France.
Vinciane RogerEcole Nationale Vétérinaire d'Alfort (Alfort School of Veterinary Medicine), University Paris-Est, Maisons-Alfort, France.
Didier RoisseService Départemental d'Incendie et de Secours de l'Oise (Fire and Rescue Service), Tillé, France.
Nicolas DirnService Départemental d'Incendie et de Secours de l'Oise (Fire and Rescue Service), Tillé, France.
Clement LevertService Départemental d'Incendie et de Secours des Yvelines (Fire and Rescue Service), Versailles, France.
Erwan BretonService Départemental d'Incendie et de Secours des Yvelines (Fire and Rescue Service), Versailles, France.
Arnaud GaltatService Départemental d'Incendie et de Secours des Yvelines (Fire and Rescue Service), Versailles, France.
Alexandre ForgetService Départemental d'Incendie et de Secours des Yvelines (Fire and Rescue Service), Versailles, France.
Sebastien CharreaudeauService Départemental d'Incendie et de Secours des Yvelines (Fire and Rescue Service), Versailles, France.
Fabien GasmiService Départemental d'Incendie et de Secours des Yvelines (Fire and Rescue Service), Versailles, France.
Caroline Jean-BaptisteEcole Nationale Vétérinaire d'Alfort (Alfort School of Veterinary Medicine), University Paris-Est, Maisons-Alfort, France.
Sebastien PetitjeanService Départemental d'Incendie et de Secours des Yvelines (Fire and Rescue Service), Versailles, France.
Katia HamonService Départemental d'Incendie et de Secours des Yvelines (Fire and Rescue Service), Versailles, France.
Jean-Michel DuquesneService Départemental d'Incendie et de Secours des Yvelines (Fire and Rescue Service), Versailles, France.
Chantal CoudertService Départemental d'Incendie et de Secours des Yvelines (Fire and Rescue Service), Versailles, France.
Jean-Pierre TourtierHôpital d'Instruction des Armées Begin (Begin Military Hospital), Saint-Mandé, France.
Christophe BillyCentre Hospitalier François Quesnay (François Quesnay Hospital Centre), GHT Yvelines, Mantes-la-Jolie, France.
Jean-Marc WurtzSite d'Altkirch GHRMSA (Groupement Hospitalier Mulhouse Sud Alsace), Altkirch, France.
Anthony ChauvinHôpital Lariboisière APHP (Lariboisière Hospital, APHP Great Paris Hospitals), Paris, France.
Xavier EyerHôpital Lariboisière APHP (Lariboisière Hospital, APHP Great Paris Hospitals), Paris, France.
Sabrina ZianiHôpitaux de Saint-Maurice (Saint-Maurice Hospital), Saint-Maurice, France.
Laura PrevelHôpital Foch (Foch Hospital), Suresnes, France.
Ilaria CherubiniHôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière APHP (Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, APHP Great Paris Hospitals), Paris, France.
Enfel Khelili-HouasHôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière APHP (Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, APHP Great Paris Hospitals), Paris, France.
Pierre HausfaterHôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière APHP (Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, APHP Great Paris Hospitals), Paris, France.
Philippe DevillierHôpital Foch (Foch Hospital), Suresnes, France.
Loic DesquilbetEcole nationale vétérinaire d'Alfort, Univ Paris Est Créteil, INSERM, IMRB, Maisons-Alfort, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is an increasing need for rapid, reliable, non-invasive, and inexpensive mass testing methods as the global COVID-19 pandemic continues. Detection dogs could be a possible solution to identify individuals infected with SARS-CoV-2. Previous studies have shown that dogs can detect SARS-CoV-2 on sweat samples. This study aims to establish the dogs' sensitivity (true positive rate) which measures the proportion of people with COVID-19 that are correctly identified, and specificity (true negative rate) which measures the proportion of people without COVID-19 that are correctly identified. Seven search and rescue dogs were tested using a total of 218 axillary sweat samples (62 positive and 156 negative) in olfaction cones following a randomised and double-blind protocol. Sensitivity ranged from 87% to 94%, and specificity ranged from 78% to 92%, with four dogs over 90%. These results were used to calculate the positive predictive value and negative predictive value for each dog for different infection probabilities (how likely it is for an individual to be SARS-CoV-2 positive), ranging from 10-50%. These results were compared with a reference diagnostic tool which has 95% specificity and sensitivity. Negative predictive values for six dogs ranged from ≥98% at 10% infection probability to ≥88% at 50% infection probability compared with the reference tool which ranged from 99% to 95%. Positive predictive values ranged from ≥40% at 10% infection probability to ≥80% at 50% infection probability compared with the reference tool which ranged from 68% to 95%. This study confirms previous results, suggesting that dogs could play an important role in mass-testing situations. Future challenges include optimal training methods and standardisation for large numbers of detection dogs and infrastructure supporting their deployment.

Indexed as

AnimalsCOVID-19DogsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsSARS-CoV-2Sensitivity and SpecificitySmellSweat

Identifiers

PMID35157716
PMCPMC8843128

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.