Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35157450›Full record

ArticleThe journal of physical chemistry. A2022

A Photochemical Reaction in Different Theoretical Representations.

Lea M Ibele, Basile F E Curchod, Federica Agostini

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of physical chemistry. A, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lea M IbeleDepartment of Chemistry, Durham University, Durham DH1 3LE, United Kingdom.
Basile F E CurchodDepartment of Chemistry, Durham University, Durham DH1 3LE, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1705-473X
Federica AgostiniUniversité Paris-Saclay, CNRS, Institut de Chimie Physique UMR8000, 91405 Orsay, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2951-4964

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Born-Oppenheimer picture has forged our representation and interpretation of photochemical processes, from photoexcitation down to the passage through a conical intersection, a funnel connecting different electronic states. In this work, we analyze a full in silico photochemical experiment, from the explicit electronic excitation by a laser pulse to the formation of photoproducts following a nonradiative decay through a conical intersection, by contrasting the picture offered by Born-Oppenheimer and that proposed by the exact factorization. The exact factorization offers an alternative understanding of photochemistry that does not rely on concepts such as electronic states, nonadiabatic couplings, and conical intersections. On the basis of nonadiabatic quantum dynamics performed for a two-state 2D model system, this work allows us to compare Born-Oppenheimer and exact factorization for (i) an explicit photoexcitation with and without the Condon approximation, (ii) the passage of a nuclear wavepacket through a conical intersection, (iii) the formation of excited stationary states in the Franck-Condon region, and (iv) the use of classical and quantum trajectories in the exact factorization picture to capture nonadiabatic processes triggered by a laser pulse.

Identifiers

PMID35157450
PMCPMC8883471

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.