ArticleThe journal of physical chemistry. A2022
A Photochemical Reaction in Different Theoretical Representations.
Article in The journal of physical chemistry. A, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Selecting Initial Conditions for Trajectory-Based Nonadiabatic Simulations.Accounts of chemical research · 2025Article
- Perspective on Theoretical and Experimental Advances in Atmospheric Photochemistry.The journal of physical chemistry. A · 2024Review
- Surface hopping modeling of charge and energy transfer in active environments.Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP · 2023Review
- Exact Factorization Adventures: A Promising Approach for Non-Bound States.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Born-Oppenheimer picture has forged our representation and interpretation of photochemical processes, from photoexcitation down to the passage through a conical intersection, a funnel connecting different electronic states. In this work, we analyze a full in silico photochemical experiment, from the explicit electronic excitation by a laser pulse to the formation of photoproducts following a nonradiative decay through a conical intersection, by contrasting the picture offered by Born-Oppenheimer and that proposed by the exact factorization. The exact factorization offers an alternative understanding of photochemistry that does not rely on concepts such as electronic states, nonadiabatic couplings, and conical intersections. On the basis of nonadiabatic quantum dynamics performed for a two-state 2D model system, this work allows us to compare Born-Oppenheimer and exact factorization for (i) an explicit photoexcitation with and without the Condon approximation, (ii) the passage of a nuclear wavepacket through a conical intersection, (iii) the formation of excited stationary states in the Franck-Condon region, and (iv) the use of classical and quantum trajectories in the exact factorization picture to capture nonadiabatic processes triggered by a laser pulse.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.