Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35157318›Full record

ArticleMedical physics2022

Technical note: Determining the applicability of a clinical knowledge-based learning model via prospective outlier detection.

Jiahan Zhang, Yang Sheng, Jonathan Wolf, Oluwatosin Kayode, Jeffrey Bradley, Yaorong Ge, Q Jackie Wu, Xiaofeng Yang, Tian Liu, Justin Roper

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical physics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jiahan ZhangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Yang ShengDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Jonathan WolfDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Oluwatosin KayodeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Jeffrey BradleyDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Yaorong GeDepartment of Software and Information Systems, The University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, North Carolina, USA.
Q Jackie WuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Xiaofeng YangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Tian LiuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Justin RoperDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.

Funding

Multiparametric MRI-guided Prostate HDR Brachytherapy with Focal Tumor BoostR01CA215718 · NCI · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI YANG, XIAOFENG · 2018 to 2022
$1.8M
Artificial Intelligence Driven Platform for PET/MR ImagingR56EB033332 · NIBIB · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI MAO, HUI, YANG, XIAOFENG · 2022 to 2022
$764k
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA215718NIBIB NIH HHS R56 EB033332
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundKnowledge-based planning (KBP) is increasingly implemented clinically because of its demonstrated ability to improve treatment planning efficiency and reduce plan quality variations. However, cases with large dose-volume histogram (DVH) prediction uncertainties may still need manual adjustments by the planner to achieve high plan quality. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to develop a data-driven method to detect patients with high prediction uncertainties so that intentional effort is directed to these patients.

methodsWe apply an anomaly detection method known as the local outlier factor (LOF) to a dataset consisting of the training set and each of the prospective patients considered, to evaluate their likelihood of being an anomaly when compared with the training cases. Features used in the LOF analysis include anatomical features and the model-generated DVH principal component scores. To test the efficacy of the proposed model, 142 prostate patients were retrieved from the clinical database and split into a training dataset of 100 patients and a test dataset of 42 patients. The outlier identification performance was quantified by the difference between the DVH prediction root-mean-squared errors (RMSE) of the identified outlier cases and that of the remaining inlier cases.

resultsWith a predefined LOF threshold of 1.4, the inlier cases achieved average RMSEs of 5.0 and 6.7 for bladder and rectum, while the outlier cases have substantially higher RMSEs of 6.7 and 13.0 in comparison.

conclusionsWe propose a method that can determine the prospective patient's outlier status. This method can be integrated into existing automated treatment planning workflows to reduce the risk of generating suboptimal treatment plans while providing an upfront alert to the treatment planner.

Indexed as

Radiotherapy, Intensity-ModulatedRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-AssistedHumansKnowledge BasesMaleOrgans at RiskPelvisProspective StudiesRadiotherapy Dosageautomated planningknowledge-based planningoutlier detection

Identifiers

PMID35157318
PMCPMC11742179

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.