Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35157307›Full record

ReviewThe British journal of dermatology2022

Flow cytometry for the assessment of blood tumour burden in cutaneous T-cell lymphoma: towards a standardized approach.

Maarten H Vermeer, Helene Moins-Teisserenc, Martine Bagot, Pietro Quaglino, Sean Whittaker

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The British journal of dermatology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Practical recommendations for therapy and monitoring of mogamulizumab patients in Germany.Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft = Journal of the German Society of Dermatology : JDDG · 2025
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. What Is New in Cutaneous T Cell Lymphoma?Current oncology reports · 2023
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 5 countries.

Maarten H VermeerDermatology Department, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-5872-4613
Helene Moins-TeisserencUniversité de Paris, Institut de Recherche Saint-Louis, INSERM UMR1160, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0003-1602-7534
Martine BagotDepartement of Dermatology, AP-HP, Hôpital Saint-Louis, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-1631-5192
Pietro QuaglinoDermatological Clinic, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin Medical School, Turin, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4185-9586
Sean WhittakerSt. John's Institute of Dermatology, School of Basic and Medical Biosciences, King's College London, Guy's Hospital, London, SE1 9RT, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0972-2600
Inserm · FRDepartment of Medical Sciences · BYGuy's Hospital · GBLeiden University Medical Center · NL

Funding

Kyowa Hakko Kirin
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mycosis fungoides (MF) and Sézary syndrome (SS) are the best-studied subtypes of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma, a rare non-Hodgkin lymphoma that primarily presents in the skin but can also involve blood, lymph nodes and viscera. The role of blood involvement in the assessment and staging of MF and SS has evolved in recent years from being classed as simply 'present' or 'absent', with no impact on staging, to full analysis of abnormal peripheral blood T cells using flow cytometry (FC) to detect and quantify aberrant T-cell phenotypes and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to characterize T-cell receptor gene rearrangements. These sensitive peripheral blood assessments are replacing manual Sézary cell counts and have become an important part of clinical workup in MF and SS, providing the potential for more accurate prognosis and appropriate management. However, although international recommendations now include guidelines for FC analysis of peripheral blood markers for staging purposes, many clinics only perform these analyses in patients with advanced-stage lymphoma, if at all, and there is still a need for standardized use of validated markers. Standardization of a single effective multiparameter FC panel would allow for accurate identification and quantification of blood tumour burden for diagnosis, staging, assessment of therapeutic response, and monitoring of disease progression at all stages of disease. Once defined, validation of an MF/SS biomarker FC panel will enable uptake into clinical settings along with associated standardization of protocols and reagents. This review discusses the evolution of the role of FC in evaluating blood involvement in MF and SS, considers recently published international guidelines and identifies evidence gaps for future research that will allow for standardization of FC in MF and SS.

Indexed as

Hematologic NeoplasmsLymphoma, T-Cell, CutaneousMycosis FungoidesSezary SyndromeSkin NeoplasmsBiomarkersFlow CytometryHumansTumor BurdenBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID35157307
PMCPMC9541328
OpenAlexW4213082617

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.