ReviewThe British journal of dermatology2022
Flow cytometry for the assessment of blood tumour burden in cutaneous T-cell lymphoma: towards a standardized approach.
Review in The British journal of dermatology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- High-throughput, multiplex immunofluorescence for the computer-automated immunophenotyping of Mycosis Fungoides.JID innovations : skin science from molecules to population health · 2026Article
- Utility of combined CD39/CD73/CD38 expression for the detection of malignant T cells in Sézary syndrome.British journal of haematology · 2026Article
- Determinants of Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) T Cell Success: In Vitro and In Vivo Preclinical Assessment.Cancers · 2026Review
- Review
- Article
- A Six-year Response to Belinostat in a Highly Probable Case of Relapsed/Refractory MF/SS Initially Classified as PTCL-NOS: A Case Report.OncoTargets and therapy · 2026Article
- Mycosis Fungoides, Sézary Syndrome, and Cutaneous B-Cell Lymphomas: 2025 Update on Diagnosis, Risk-Stratification, and Management.American journal of hematology · 2025Review
- Article
- Diagnostic Challenges of Early Mycosis Fungoides in Skin of Color: A Case Report and Review.Cureus · 2025Article
- Practical recommendations for therapy and monitoring of mogamulizumab patients in Germany.Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft = Journal of the German Society of Dermatology : JDDG · 2025Review
- A practical approach to the modern diagnosis and classification of T- and NK-cell lymphomas.Blood · 2024Review
- Possible role of a malfunctioning immune system in discordant lymphoma with peripheral T‑cell lymphoma secondary to classical Hodgkin lymphoma: A case report.Oncology letters · 2024Article
- Article
- What Is New in Cutaneous T Cell Lymphoma?Current oncology reports · 2023Review
- Immunosequencing applications in cutaneous T-cell lymphoma.Frontiers in immunology · 2023Review
- Cutaneous T-cell lymphomas: 2023 update on diagnosis, risk-stratification, and management.American journal of hematology · 2023Article
- STING expression is an independent prognostic factor in patients with mycosis fungoides.Scientific reports · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 5 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Mycosis fungoides (MF) and Sézary syndrome (SS) are the best-studied subtypes of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma, a rare non-Hodgkin lymphoma that primarily presents in the skin but can also involve blood, lymph nodes and viscera. The role of blood involvement in the assessment and staging of MF and SS has evolved in recent years from being classed as simply 'present' or 'absent', with no impact on staging, to full analysis of abnormal peripheral blood T cells using flow cytometry (FC) to detect and quantify aberrant T-cell phenotypes and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to characterize T-cell receptor gene rearrangements. These sensitive peripheral blood assessments are replacing manual Sézary cell counts and have become an important part of clinical workup in MF and SS, providing the potential for more accurate prognosis and appropriate management. However, although international recommendations now include guidelines for FC analysis of peripheral blood markers for staging purposes, many clinics only perform these analyses in patients with advanced-stage lymphoma, if at all, and there is still a need for standardized use of validated markers. Standardization of a single effective multiparameter FC panel would allow for accurate identification and quantification of blood tumour burden for diagnosis, staging, assessment of therapeutic response, and monitoring of disease progression at all stages of disease. Once defined, validation of an MF/SS biomarker FC panel will enable uptake into clinical settings along with associated standardization of protocols and reagents. This review discusses the evolution of the role of FC in evaluating blood involvement in MF and SS, considers recently published international guidelines and identifies evidence gaps for future research that will allow for standardization of FC in MF and SS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.