Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35157227›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2022

Automatic detection and classification of peri-prosthetic femur fracture.

Asma Alzaid, Alice Wignall, Sanja Dogramadzi, Hemant Pandit, Sheng Quan Xie

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Asma AlzaidSchool of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK. scaalz@leeds.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2072-966X
Alice WignallTrauma and orthopaedics Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Sanja DogramadziDepartment of Automatic Control and Systems Engineering, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Hemant PanditLeeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK.
Sheng Quan XieSchool of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK. S.Q.Xie@leeds.ac.uk.
University of Leeds · GBLeeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust · GBUniversity of Sheffield · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeObject classification and localization is a key task of computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) tool. Although there have been numerous generic deep learning (DL) models developed for CAD, there is no work in the literature to evaluate their effectiveness when utilized in diagnosing fractures in proximity of joint implants. In this work, we aim to assess the performance of existing classification systems on binary and multi-class problems (fracture types) using plain radiographs. In addition, we evaluated the performance of object detection systems using the one- and two-stage DL architectures.

methodsA data set of 1272 X-ray images of Peri-prosthetic Femur Fracture PFF was collected. The fractures were annotated with bounding boxes and classified according to the Vancouver Classification System (type A, B, C) by two clinical specialists. Four classification models such as Densenet161, Resnet50, Inception, VGG and two object detection models such as Faster RCNN and RetinaNet were evaluated, and their performance compared. Six confusion matrix-based measures were reported to evaluate fracture classification. For localization of the fracture, Average Precision and localization accuracy were reported.

resultsThe Resnet50 showed the best performance with [Formula: see text] accuracy and [Formula: see text] F1-score in the binary classification: fracture/normal. In addition, the Resnet50 showed [Formula: see text] accuracy in multi-classification (normal, Vancouver type A, B and C).

conclusionsA large data set of PFF images and the annotations of fracture features by two independent assessments were created to implement a DL-based approach for detecting, classifying and localizing PFFs. It was shown that this approach could be a promising diagnostic tool of fractures in proximity of joint implants.

Indexed as

Deep LearningFemoral FracturesDiagnosis, Computer-AssistedFemurHumansRadiographyBone fractureComputer aided diagnosticsDeep learningMedical imagingSurgical planning

Identifiers

PMID35157227
PMCPMC8948116
OpenAlexW4212998567

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.