Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35157209›Full record

SynthesisNeuropsychology review2023

Behaviour Change Techniques in Computerized Cognitive Training for Cognitively Healthy Older Adults: A Systematic Review.

Geeske Peeters, Irene L Black, Sjaan R Gomersall, Juliette Fritschi, Aoife Sweeney, Yasmin Guedes de Oliveira, Rogerio Panizzutti, Claire T McEvoy, Amit Lampit

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Neuropsychology review, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 7 institutions in 5 countries.

Geeske PeetersGlobal Brain Health Institute, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland. geeske.peeters@radboudumc.nl.ORCID 0000-0003-4460-7026
Irene L BlackDepartment of Clinical Nutrition and Dietetics, CHI Crumlin, Dublin, Ireland.
Sjaan R GomersallSchool of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Juliette FritschiThe Movement Mentor Physiotherapy, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Aoife SweeneyCentre for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland.
Yasmin Guedes de OliveiraInstitute of Psychiatry, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Rogerio PanizzuttiGlobal Brain Health Institute, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Claire T McEvoyGlobal Brain Health Institute, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Amit LampitDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro · BRAustralian Physiotherapy Association · AURadboud University Nijmegen · NLThe University of Melbourne · AUThe University of Queensland · AUTrinity College Dublin · IEUniversity College Dublin · IE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We aimed to describe behaviour change techniques (BCT) used in trials evaluating computerised cognitive training (CCT) in cognitively healthy older adults, and explore whether BCTs are associated with improved adherence and efficacy. The 90 papers included in a recent meta-analysis were reviewed for information about adherence and use of BCTs in accordance with the Behaviour Change Taxonomy. Studies using a specific BCT were compared with studies not using that BCT on efficacy (difference in Hedges' g [Δg]) using three level meta-regression models and on median adherence using the Wilcoxon test. The median number of BCTs per study was 3 (interquartile range [IQR] = 2-5). 'Feedback on behaviour' (if provided by a person; Δg = -0.19, 95% confidence interval [CI] = -0.31;-0.07) and 'non-specific reward' (Δg = -0.19, CI = -0.34;-0.05) were associated with lower efficacy. Certain BCTs that involve personal contact may be beneficial, although none were statistically significantly associated with greater efficacy. The median percentage of adherence was 90% (IQR = 81-95). Adherence was higher in studies using the BCT 'self-monitoring of behaviour' and lower in studies using the BCT 'graded tasks' than studies not using these BCTs (p < 0.001). These findings provide first evidence that BCTs can influence both adherence to and efficacy of CCT programs in cognitively healthy older adults.

Indexed as

Behavior TherapyCognitive TrainingAgedHumansAdherenceBehaviour change taxonomyBrain trainingCognitive functioningMotivation

Identifiers

PMID35157209
PMCPMC9998598
OpenAlexW4212828768

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.