ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2022
Attitudes and Actions Related to Racism: the Anti-RaCism (ARC) Survey Study.
Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- A national pilot study on simulation-based upstander training for emergency medicine clinicians.AEM education and training · 2024Article
- An Anti-Racism and Equity Initiative Improves Residency Educational Conferences.Journal of graduate medical education · 2023Article
- DARE Training: Teaching Educators How to Revise Internal Medicine Residency Lectures by Using an Anti-racism Framework.MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources · 2023Article
- Promoting anti-racism in the legal system: an application of the STYLE framework.Frontiers in psychology · 2023Article
- Mapping the distribution of health equity research and practice across a university: a network analysis.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2023Article
- A Call for Restorative and Transformative Justice Approaches to Anti-Racism in Medicine.Journal of general internal medicine · 2022Article
- Investigating Moral Distress in Clinical Research Professionals-A Deep Dive into Troubled Waters.Ethics & human researchArticle
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRacism negatively impacts health and well-being. Members of the medical community must intervene to address racism.
objectiveTo assess whether attitudes about the impact of racism on health or society are associated with intervening around racism.
designCross-sectional survey of a large department of medicine in an urban academic setting.
participantsInterns, residents, fellows, and faculty. MAIN MEASURES: The primary outcome was the likelihood of intervening around an observed racist encounter or a racist policy. Predictor variables included age, gender identity, race/ethnicity, and attitudes about racism. KEY
resultsAlthough the majority of the 948 respondents endorsed the impact of racism on health and other societal effects, levels of endorsement were lower among older individuals, or those reporting male gender identity or selecting other race. Higher endorsement of the impact of racism on health was associated with increased odds of speaking up about a racist encounter or racist policy, with odds ratios from 1.18 to 1.30 across scenarios. Likelihood of speaking up about racism did not differ by racial or ethnic group, but older individuals were generally more likely to speak up and individuals between 20 and 29 years of age were more likely to speak with someone other than leadership or the source of a racist encounter.
conclusionsAwareness of the effects of racism on health is associated with increased likelihood of intervening when a racist encounter is observed or a racist policy is noted. Including information on the impact of racism on health and creating safe spaces to discuss racism may increase the likelihood of bystander intervention in anti-racism strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.