ArticleJournal of plant research2022
Effects of different photoperiods on flower opening, flower closing and circadian expression of clock-related genes in Iris domestica and I. dichotoma.
Article in Journal of plant research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Plant movements: navigating the light environment.Plant physiology · 2026Review
- Machine learning assisted analysis of rice flower opening times using a low-cost time-lapse camera.Journal of plant research · 2025Article
- ThePlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The circadian clock can entrain to forced light-dark cycles by adjusting the phases and periods of flower opening and closing in ephemeral flowers. The responses of circadian rhythms to the same light conditions differ from species. However, the differences in internal genetic mechanisms underlying the different responses between species remain unclear. Iris domestica and I. dichotoma have ephemeral flowers and significantly divergent flower opening and closing times. The effects of different photoperiods (continuous darkness, 4L20D, 8L16D, 12L12D, 16L8D, 20L4D and continuous white light) on flower opening and closing, and expression patterns of seven genes (CRYPTOCHROME 1, PHYTOCHROME B, LATE ELONGATED HYPOCOTYL, PSEUDO RESPONSE REGULATOR 95, PHYTOCHROME INTERACTING FACTOR 4-like, SMUX AUXIN UP RNA 64-like and senescence-associated gene 39-like) involved in the circadian regulation of flower opening and closing were compared between I. domestica and I. dichotoma. Flower opening and closing in the two species exhibited circadian rhythms under continuous darkness (DD), but showed arrhythmia in continuous white light (LL). In the two species, keeping robust rhythms, strong synchronicity, rapid progressions of flower opening and closing and reaching full opening stage required a dark period longer than 4 h. In light-dark cycles with dark periods longer than 4 h, flower opening and closing times of the two species delayed with the delay of dawn, and the degree to which flower opening time varies with the time of dawn was greater in I. dichotoma than in I. domestica. The arrhythmia of flower opening and closing under 20L4D and LL would result from the arrhythmic output signals rather than arrhythmia of oscillators and photoreceptors. The different responses of the two species to the change of photoperiods would be caused by the transcriptional differences of genes in the output pathway of circadian clock system rather than in the input pathway or oscillators.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.