Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35157155›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental monitoring and assessment2022

Merging of the Case 2 Regional Coast Colour and Maximum-Peak Height chlorophyll-a algorithms: validation and demonstration of satellite-derived retrievals across US lakes.

Blake Schaeffer, Wilson Salls, Megan Coffer, Carole Lebreton, Mortimer Werther, Kerstin Stelzer, Erin Urquhart, Daniela Gurlin

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental monitoring and assessment, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Blake SchaefferOffice of Research and Development, US EPA, Durham, NC, 27709, USA. schaeffer.blake@epa.gov.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9794-3977
Wilson SallsOffice of Research and Development, US EPA, Durham, NC, 27709, USA.
Megan CofferOak Ridge Institute for Science and Education, US EPA, Durham, NC, 27709, USA.
Carole LebretonBrockmann Consult, Hamburg, Germany.
Mortimer WertherBrockmann Consult, Hamburg, Germany.
Kerstin StelzerBrockmann Consult, Hamburg, Germany.
Erin UrquhartScience Systems and Applications, Inc, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, 20771, USA.
Daniela GurlinWisconsin Department of Natural Resources, Madison, WI, 53707, USA.

Funding

Horizon 2020 730141NASA 14-SMDUNSOL14-0001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Water quality monitoring is relevant for protecting the designated, or beneficial uses, of water such as drinking, aquatic life, recreation, irrigation, and food supply that support the economy, human well-being, and aquatic ecosystem health. Managing finite water resources to support these designated uses requires information on water quality so that managers can make sustainable decisions. Chlorophyll-a (chl-a, µg L

Indexed as

EcosystemLakesAlgorithmsChlorophyllChlorophyll AColorEnvironmental MonitoringHumansChlorophyllChlorophyll AChlorophyllLakesReservoirsSatelliteTrophic stateWater quality

Identifiers

PMID35157155
PMCPMC8843926

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.