Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35157124›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2022

Clinical utility of near-infrared perfusion assessment of the gastric tube during Ivor Lewis esophagectomy.

Elke Van Daele, Naomi De Bruyne, Hanne Vanommeslaeghe, Yves Van Nieuwenhove, Wim Ceelen, Piet Pattyn

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Elke Van DaeleDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Ghent University Hospital, 2K12 IC, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, B-9000, Ghent, Belgium. elke.vandaele@uzgent.be.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0336-4179
Naomi De BruyneDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Ghent University Hospital, 2K12 IC, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, B-9000, Ghent, Belgium.
Hanne VanommeslaegheDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Ghent University Hospital, 2K12 IC, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, B-9000, Ghent, Belgium.
Yves Van NieuwenhoveDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Ghent University Hospital, 2K12 IC, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, B-9000, Ghent, Belgium.
Wim CeelenDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Ghent University Hospital, 2K12 IC, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, B-9000, Ghent, Belgium.
Piet PattynDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Ghent University Hospital, 2K12 IC, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, B-9000, Ghent, Belgium.
Ghent University Hospital · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAnastomotic leakage (AL) after Ivor Lewis esophagectomy with intrathoracic anastomosis carries a significant morbidity. Adequate perfusion of the gastric tube (GT) is an important predictor of anastomotic integrity. Recently, near infrared fluorescent (NIRF) imaging using indocyanine green (ICG) was introduced in clinical practice to evaluate tissue perfusion. We evaluated the feasibility and efficacy of GT indocyanine green angiography (ICGA) after Ivor Lewis esophagectomy.

methodsThis retrospective analysis used data from a prospectively kept database of consecutive patients who underwent Ivor Lewis (IL) esophagectomy with GT construction for cancer between January 2016 and December 2020. Relevant outcomes were feasibility, ICGA complications and the impact of ICGA on AL.

results266 consecutive IL patients were identified who matched the inclusion criteria. The 115 patients operated with perioperative ICGA were compared to a control group in whom surgery was performed according to the standard of care. ICGA perfusion assessment was feasible and safe in all 115 procedures and suggested a poorly perfused tip in 56/115 (48.7%) cases, for which additional resection was performed. The overall AL rate was 16% (43/266), with 12% (33/266) needing an endoscopic our surgical intervention and 6% (17/266) needing ICU support. In univariable and multivariable analyses, ICGA was not correlated with the risk of AL (ICGA:14.8% vs non-ICGA:17.2%, p = 0.62). However, poor ICGA perfusion of the GT predicted a higher AL rate, despite additional resection of the tip (ICGA poorly perfused: 19.6% vs ICG well perfused: 10.2%, p = 0.19).

conclusionsICGA is safe and feasible, but did not result in a reduction of AL. The interpretation and necessary action in case of perioperative presence of ischemia on ICGA have yet to be determined. Prospective randomized trials are warranted to analyze its benefit on AL in esophageal surgery. Trial registration Ethical approval for a prospective esophageal surgery database was granted by the Ethical committee of the Ghent University Hospital. Belgian registration number: B670201111232. Ethical approval for this retrospective data analysis was granted by our institutional EC. REGISTRATION NUMBER: BC-09216.

Indexed as

Esophageal NeoplasmsEsophagectomyAnastomosis, SurgicalAnastomotic LeakHumansIndocyanine GreenPerfusionProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesIndocyanine GreenAnastomotic leakageEsophagectomyIndocyanine green angiographyIvor lewisNear infrared fluorescence imagingStomach graft

Identifiers

PMID35157124
OpenAlexW4212796914

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.