ArticleWorld journal of surgery2022
Surgical Catastrophic Health Expenditure and Risk Factors for Out-of-Pocket Expenditure at a South African Public Sector Hospital.
Article in World journal of surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWorldwide, 3.7 billion people risk financial catastrophe if they require surgery, mostly affecting the poorest populations. Surgical care associated with catastrophic health expenditure (CHE) has not been well-described in the South African context. The objectives of this study were to determine: (1) the proportion of surgical patients at a South African hospital who experienced CHE and impoverishing health expenditure (IHE); and (2) the risk factors for out-of-pocket (OOP) payments.
methodsA cross-sectional prospective questionnaire was administered to participants admitted for a surgical procedure at New Somerset Hospital, Cape Town. CHE was defined in three ways: (1) 40% or more of capacity-to-pay, (2) 25% of annual household expenditure, or (3) 10% of annual household expenditure. IHE was described as the number of participants who experienced new or worsening impoverishment after surgery.
resultsTwo hundred and seventy-four participants were interviewed, and 263 were included in the analysis (4% attrition rate). Two (0.8%) participants experienced CHE. 98.5% of participants spent less than 10% of their annual household expenditure and 43 participants (16.7%) experienced IHE. Risk factors for OOP expenditure were cancer diagnosis (p = 0.0386), an elective procedure (p = 0.0001), and having a limited health insurance plan (p = 0.0492). DISCUSSION: Most participants undergoing a surgical procedure did not experience CHE. Participants were relatively protected from financial catastrophe owing to subsidized user fees and the provision of transport. However, 17% of patients experienced IHE, suggesting even small payments resulted in impoverishment. Ensuring low financial vulnerabilities around surgical care is an important consideration for national surgical planning in South Africa.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.