Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35157088›Full record

ReviewClinical neuroradiology2022

Radiological Evaluation Criteria for Chronic Subdural Hematomas : Review of the Literature.

Matthias Bechstein, Rosalie McDonough, Jens Fiehler, Umberto Zanolini, Hamid Rai, Adnan Siddiqui, Eimad Shotar, Aymeric Rouchaud, Mayank Goyal, Susanne Gellissen

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical neuroradiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Matthias BechsteinDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany. m.bechstein@uke.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5652-7499
Rosalie McDonoughDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
Jens FiehlerDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
Umberto ZanoliniDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
Hamid RaiDepartment of Neurosurgery, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA.
Adnan SiddiquiDepartment of Neurosurgery, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA.
Eimad ShotarNeuroradiology Department, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France.
Aymeric RouchaudNeuroradiology Department, Dupuytren, University Hospital of Limoges, Limoges Cedex, France.
Mayank GoyalDepartment of Radiology, University of Calgary Cumming School of Medicine, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Susanne GellissenDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
Universität Hamburg · DEUniversity at Buffalo, State University of New York · USHôpital Dupuytren · FRSorbonne Université · FRUniversity of Calgary · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe methodology of measuring chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH) extent and its effect on intracranial structures is relevant for patient classification and outcome measurements and affects the external validity of cSDH studies. With embolization of the middle meningeal artery (MMA) as a possible treatment of cSDHs, the topic has gained substantial interest. We sought to summarize the heterogeneity of radiologic measurements, specifically in the evaluation of cSDHs based on literature review.

methodsIn this review, we identified and described the most common radiological methodologies for measurements of cSDH thickness, cSDH volume and of midline shift.

conclusionThere are numerous published methods on how to evaluate cSDH thickness, cSDH volume and midline shift but no common standard. The definition of measurement methods and reporting standards for MMA embolization in cSDH patients and their validation needs to be addressed.

Indexed as

Embolization, TherapeuticHematoma, Subdural, ChronicHumansMeningeal ArteriesRadiographyTomography, X-Ray ComputedEmbolizationIntracranial hemorrhageMiddle meningeal arteryMidline shiftSubdural hematoma

Identifiers

PMID35157088
PMCPMC9744701
OpenAlexW4213055251

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.