Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35157067›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of epidemiology2022

Body mass index rebound and pubertal timing in girls with and without a family history of breast cancer: the LEGACY girls study.

Lauren C Houghton, Ying Wei, Tianying Wang, Mandy Goldberg, Alejandra Paniagua-Avila, Rachel L Sweeden, Angela Bradbury, Mary Daly, Lisa A Schwartz, Theresa Keegan and 9 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of epidemiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 98% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 9 institutions in 2 countries.

Lauren C HoughtonDepartment of Epidemiology, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1432-1580
Ying WeiDepartment of Biostatistics, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, NY, USA.
Tianying WangDepartment of Biostatistics, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, NY, USA.
Mandy GoldbergDepartment of Epidemiology, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6794-1206
Alejandra Paniagua-AvilaDepartment of Epidemiology, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, NY, USA.
Rachel L SweedenDepartment of Epidemiology, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, NY, USA.
Angela BradburyDepartments of Medicine and Hematology/Oncology and of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Mary DalyDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Lisa A SchwartzDivision of Oncology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Theresa KeeganDepartment of Internal Medicine, Center for Oncology Hematology Outcomes Research and Training (COHORT), University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA.
Esther M JohnDepartments of Epidemiology & Population Health and Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Julia A KnightStanford Cancer Institute, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Irene L AndrulisStanford Cancer Institute, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Saundra S BuysDepartment of Medicine, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Caren J FrostCollege of Social Work, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Karen O'TooleDepartment of Medicine, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Melissa L WhiteDepartment of Epidemiology, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, NY, USA.
Wendy K ChungDepartments of Pediatrics and Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Mary Beth TerryDepartment of Epidemiology, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, NY, USA.
Columbia University · USColumbia University Irving Medical Center · USUniversity of Utah · USUniversity of Toronto · CAChildren's Hospital of Philadelphia · USFox Chase Cancer Center · USStanford University · USUniversity of California, Davis · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

LEGACY: A cohort of youth in families from the Breast Cancer Family RegistryR01CA138844 · NCI · SINAI HEALTH SYSTEM · PI ANDRULIS, IRENE · 2011 to 2015
$1.8M
The Role of Androgens on Breast Cancer Susceptibility across the Lifecourse.K07CA218166 · NCI · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI HOUGHTON, LAUREN C · 2018 to 2022
$864k
NCI NIH HHS K07 CA218166NCI NIH HHS R01 CA138844
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHeavier body mass index (BMI) is the most established predictor of earlier age at puberty. However, it is unknown whether the timing of the childhood switch to heavier BMI (age at BMI rebound) also matters for puberty.

methodsIn the LEGACY Girls Study (n = 1040), a longitudinal cohort enriched with girls with a family history of breast cancer, we collected paediatric growth chart data from 852 girls and assessed pubertal development every 6 months. Using constrained splines, we interpolated individual growth curves and then predicted BMI at ages 2, 4, 6, 8 and 9 years for 591 girls. We defined age at BMI rebound as the age at the lowest BMI between ages 2 and 8 years and assessed its association with onset of thelarche, pubarche and menarche using Weibull survival models.

resultsThe median age at BMI rebound was 5.3 years (interquartile range: 3.6-6.7 years). A 1-year increase in age at BMI rebound was associated with delayed thelarche (HR = 0.90; 95% CI = 0.83-0.97) and menarche (HR = 0.86; 95% CI = 0.79-0.94). The magnitude of these associations remained after adjusting for weight between birth and 2 years, was stronger after adjusting for BMI at age 9, and was stronger in a subset of girls with clinically assessed breast development.

conclusionsEarlier BMI rebound is associated with earlier pubertal timing. Our observation that BMI rebound may be a driver of pubertal timing in girls with and without a family history of breast cancer provides insight into how growth and pubertal timing are associated with breast cancer risk.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsBody Mass IndexBreastChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansMenarchePubertyadiposity reboundBMIGrowthpuberty

Identifiers

PMID35157067
PMCPMC9799198
OpenAlexW4210775085

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.