Best Practices for the Conduct of Antiracist Research: Time for Formal, Tailored Curricula.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Incorporating Anti-racist Principles Throughout the Research Lifecycle: A Position Statement from the Society of General Internal Medicine (SGIM).Journal of general internal medicine · 2024
   Review
2. Interpreting and Addressing Racialized Inequities in Rheumatic Disease Care and Outcomes.Arthritis care & research · 2024
   Article
3. Recommendations for Reporting Research About Racial Disparities in Medical and Scientific Journals.JAMA pediatrics · 2024
   Article
4. Antiracist Practices Across the Stages of a Research Project: A Narrative Review.Health equity
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Funding

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as