Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35156756›Full record

Trial reportJournal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.)2022

Using web-based training to improve accuracy of blood pressure measurement among health care professionals: A randomized trial.

Rupinder Hayer, Kate Kirley, Jordana B Cohen, Stavros Tsipas, Susan E Sutherland, Suzanne Oparil, Christina M Shay, Debbie L Cohen, Christopher Kabir, Gregory Wozniak

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Hypertension Management in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease.Methodist DeBakey cardiovascular journal · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Rupinder HayerDepartment of Improving Health Outcomes, American Medical Association, Chicago, Illinois, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7096-775X
Kate KirleyDepartment of Improving Health Outcomes, American Medical Association, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Jordana B CohenRenal-Electrolyte and Hypertension Division, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4649-079X
Stavros TsipasDepartment of Improving Health Outcomes, American Medical Association, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Susan E SutherlandDepartment of Improving Health Outcomes, American Medical Association, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Suzanne OparilDivision of Cardiovascular Disease, Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.
Christina M ShayGlobal Epidemiology and RWE, Boehringer Ingelheim, Ingelheim, Germany.
Debbie L CohenRenal-Electrolyte and Hypertension Division, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Christopher KabirAurora Research Institute, Aurora Health, Downers Grove, Illinois, USA.
Gregory WozniakDepartment of Improving Health Outcomes, American Medical Association, Chicago, Illinois, USA.

Funding

Blockade of calcium channels and beta adrenergic receptors for physiologic abnormalities in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (BLOCK HFpEF)R01HL153646 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI COHEN, JORDANA B. · 2020 to 2024
$3.2M
Management of hypertension in obesity: Antihypertensive class effects, blood pressure control, and renal and cardiac outcomesK23HL133843 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI COHEN, JORDANA B. · 2016 to 2020
$945k
NHLBI NIH HHS K23 HL133843NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL153646
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate blood pressure measurement is crucial for proper screening, diagnosis, and monitoring of high blood pressure. However, providers are not aware of proper blood pressure measurement skills, do not master all the appropriate skills, or miss key steps in the process, leading to inconsistent or inaccurate readings. Training in blood pressure measurement for most providers is usually limited to a one-time brief demonstration during professional education coursework. The American Medical Association and the American Heart Association developed a 30-minute e-Learning module designed to refresh and improve existing blood pressure measurement knowledge and clinical skills among practicing providers. One hundred seventy-seven practicing providers, which included medical assistants, nurses, advanced practice providers, and physicians, participated in a multi-site randomized educational study designed to assess the effect of this e-Learning module on blood pressure measurement knowledge and skills. Participants were randomized 1:1 to either the intervention or control group. The intervention group followed a pre-post assessment approach, and the control group followed a test-retest approach. The initial assessment showed that participants in both the intervention and control groups correctly performed less than half of the 14 skills considered necessary to obtain an accurate blood pressure measurement (mean scores 5.5 and 5.9, respectively). Following the e-Learning module, the intervention group performed on average of 3.4 more skills correctly vs 1.4 in the control group (P < .01). Our findings reinforce existing evidence that errors in provider blood pressure measurements are highly prevalent and provide novel evidence that refresher training improves measurement accuracy.

Indexed as

HypertensionBlood PressureBlood Pressure DeterminationHealth PersonnelHumansInternet

Identifiers

PMID35156756
PMCPMC8924996

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.