Trial reportJournal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.)2022
Using web-based training to improve accuracy of blood pressure measurement among health care professionals: A randomized trial.
Trial report in Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Using web-based training to improve accuracy of blood pressure measurement among health care professionals: A randomized trial.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2022Trial
- Assessing and Optimizing Blood Pressure Measurement Technique in Clinical Practice The BPRIGHT Project (Blood Pressure Reliability through Implementation of Guidelines and Holistic Training).Journal of human hypertension · 2026Article
- Curriculum Integration of an Interactive Blood Pressure Measurement Module to Improve Healthcare Students' Knowledge, Confidence, and Skills.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2026Article
- Closing the Gap: Standardizing Blood Pressure Measurement Training for all Healthcare Students.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2025Article
- Non-communicable diseases, digital education and considerations for the Indian context - a scoping review.BMC public health · 2024Article
- Implementing a Blood Pressure Measurement Curriculum for First-Year Medical Students.Medical science educator · 2023Article
- Redesigning blood pressure measurement training in healthcare schools.Medical education online · 2022Article
- Hypertension Management in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease.Methodist DeBakey cardiovascular journal · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate blood pressure measurement is crucial for proper screening, diagnosis, and monitoring of high blood pressure. However, providers are not aware of proper blood pressure measurement skills, do not master all the appropriate skills, or miss key steps in the process, leading to inconsistent or inaccurate readings. Training in blood pressure measurement for most providers is usually limited to a one-time brief demonstration during professional education coursework. The American Medical Association and the American Heart Association developed a 30-minute e-Learning module designed to refresh and improve existing blood pressure measurement knowledge and clinical skills among practicing providers. One hundred seventy-seven practicing providers, which included medical assistants, nurses, advanced practice providers, and physicians, participated in a multi-site randomized educational study designed to assess the effect of this e-Learning module on blood pressure measurement knowledge and skills. Participants were randomized 1:1 to either the intervention or control group. The intervention group followed a pre-post assessment approach, and the control group followed a test-retest approach. The initial assessment showed that participants in both the intervention and control groups correctly performed less than half of the 14 skills considered necessary to obtain an accurate blood pressure measurement (mean scores 5.5 and 5.9, respectively). Following the e-Learning module, the intervention group performed on average of 3.4 more skills correctly vs 1.4 in the control group (P < .01). Our findings reinforce existing evidence that errors in provider blood pressure measurements are highly prevalent and provide novel evidence that refresher training improves measurement accuracy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.