Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35156726›Full record

ArticleOphthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists)2022

Working principle and relevant physical properties of the Swiss Liquid Jet Aesthesiometer for Corneal Sensitivity (SLACS) evaluation.

Daniela S Nosch, Matthias Oscity, Peter Steigmeier, Emanuele Käser, Markus Loepfe, Roland E Joos

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05298917 nacompletednot on this map

Influence of Silicone Hydrogel Extended Contact Lens Wear on Corneal Sensitivity

TypeinterventionalSponsorDaniela NoschRan2022 to 2022Enrolled30ConditionsCorneaArmssilicone hydrogel contact lens
NCT05745220 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Corneal Sensitivity in Silicone Hydrogel Contact Lens Wear

TypeinterventionalSponsorDaniela NoschRan2023 to 2023Enrolled42ConditionsCorneaArmsDevice: silicone hydrogel contact lens
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Evaluation of Corneal Sensitivity: Tools We Have.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  5. Non-contact confocal calcium imaging ofBiomedical optics express · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Working principle and relevant physical properties of the Swiss Liquid Jet Aesthesiometer for Corneal Sensitivity (SLACS) evaluation.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Daniela S NoschInstitute of Optometry, University of Applied Sciences and Arts Northwestern Switzerland (FHNW), Olten, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-7995-2121
Matthias OscityInstitute of Sensors and Electronics, University of Applied Sciences and Arts Northwestern Switzerland (FHNW), Windisch, Switzerland.
Peter SteigmeierInstitute of Sensors and Electronics, University of Applied Sciences and Arts Northwestern Switzerland (FHNW), Windisch, Switzerland.
Emanuele KäserInstitute of Optometry, University of Applied Sciences and Arts Northwestern Switzerland (FHNW), Olten, Switzerland.
Markus LoepfeInstitute of Sensors and Electronics, University of Applied Sciences and Arts Northwestern Switzerland (FHNW), Windisch, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-8973-6676
Roland E JoosInstitute of Optometry, University of Applied Sciences and Arts Northwestern Switzerland (FHNW), Olten, Switzerland.
FHNW University of Applied Sciences and Arts · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo describe and evaluate relevant physical properties of the Swiss Liquid Jet Aesthesiometer for Corneal Sensitivity (SLACS) for ocular surface sensitivity measurement.

methodsCharacteristics of Liquid Jet (LJ) droplets (consisting of isotonic saline solution) were analysed: vertical and horizontal displacement and speed of LJ droplets were recorded with the aid of the High Speed Photron FASTCAM NOVA S6 camera (stimulus duration: 40 ms). Stimulus mass was assessed for 20 sets of 10 LJs with aid of a microbalance (pressure range of 100-1500 mbar).

resultsBecause continuous flow LJ disintegrated into droplets in the lower pressure range (<700 mbar), pulsed stimuli were applied in order to obtain similar stimulus characteristics across the applied pressure range. For all measurements, very little variability was observed. Vertical and horizontal displacement did not exceed 0.13 mm in either direction. The mass per shot showed an unexpected cubic dependency on pressure. Up to approximately 700 mbar, LJ speed showed an almost linear relationship. For the pressure range of >700-1500 mbar, variability increased and speed decreased compared to the expected in a linear manner. However, this may be caused by the difficulty of identifying pattern changes of LJ droplets from one high speed image frame to the next with increasing stimulus speed, when determining LJ speed via pixel count.

conclusionsSwiss Liquid Jet Aesthesiometer for Corneal Sensitivity was shown to deliver fine droplets with a pulsed stimulus mode, in a repeatable manner with precise localisation to the ocular surface. Very little variability was observed in LJ speed and mass for the typical pressure range required for clinical sensitivity measurements.

Indexed as

CorneaEthnicityHumansSwitzerlandcorneacorneal sensitivityliquid jet aesthesiometry

Identifiers

PMID35156726
PMCPMC9305237
OpenAlexW4213254699

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.