Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35156660›Full record

ArticleJournal of visualized experiments : JoVE2022

Rapid Isolation of Wild Nematodes by Baermann Funnel.

Sophia C Tintori, Solomon A Sloat, Matthew V Rockman

Open access · bronzeAbstract readVideo-Audio Media
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Comparison of wet mount, Mini-FLOTAC and Midi Parasep® coprological techniques for the detection ofInternational journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. PatentFrontiers in veterinary science · 2025
    Article
  13. Early diagnosis ofVeterinary world · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Ecology and evolution · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sophia C Tintori *Department of Biology and Center for Genomics & Systems Biology, New York University.
Solomon A Sloat *Department of Biology and Center for Genomics & Systems Biology, New York University.
Matthew V RockmanDepartment of Biology and Center for Genomics & Systems Biology, New York University; mrockman@nyu.edu.
New York University · US

Funding

Evolutionary Genetics of Animal DevelopmentR35GM141906 · NIGMS · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI Matthew Rockman · 2021 to 2026
$2.6M
Mechanisms of radiation tolerance in Caenorhabditis from ChernobylR21ES031364 · NIEHS · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI ROCKMAN, MATTHEW · 2020 to 2021
$434k
NIEHS NIH HHS R21 ES031364NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM141906
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Beyond being robust experimental model organisms, Caenorhabditis elegans and its relatives are also real animals that live in nature. Studies of wild nematodes in their natural environments are valuable for understanding many aspects of biology, including the selective regimes in which distinctive genomic and phenotypic characters evolve, the genetic basis for complex trait variation, and the natural genetic diversity fundamental to all animal populations. This manuscript describes a simple and efficient method for extracting nematodes from their natural substrates, including rotting fruits, flowers, fungi, leaf litter, and soil. The Baermann funnel method, a classical nematology technique, selectively isolates active nematodes from their substrates. Because it recovers nearly all active worms from the sample, the Baermann funnel technique allows for the recovery of rare and slow-growing genotypes that co-occur with abundant and fast-growing genotypes, which might be missed in extraction methods that involve multiple generations of reproduction. The technique is also well suited to addressing metagenetic, population-genetic, and ecological questions. It captures the entire population in a sample simultaneously, allowing an unbiased view of the natural distribution of ages, sexes, and genotypes. The protocol allows for deployment at scale in the field, rapidly converting substrates into worm plates, and the authors have validated it through fieldwork on multiple continents.

Indexed as

NematodaAnimalsCaenorhabditis elegansEnvironmentGenotypeSoilSoil

Identifiers

PMID35156660
PMCPMC8857960
OpenAlexW4210291851

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.